The Political geography of India at the time of the Arab invasion of India! The Political geography of India at the time of the Arab invasion of India!

First of all there is no such thing as the Muslim conquest of India. There were Arab, Persian or Turki invasions of India. The mother of Mahmud of Ghazni was herself a native of the ancient Indian Hindu kingdom of Zabulistan. Afghanistan was part of the political geography of India and the Arabs and Persians regarded Zabul as part of Hind. In fact right from classical ancient period, the western frontier of India was never restricted to the Sindhu river in near western India and Aria, Arachosia, Gedrosia and Drangiana were regarded as part of India by classical

authors like Pliny the Elder. According to Pliny the Elder, “Most geographers, in fact, do not look upon India as bounded by the river Indus, but add to it the four satrapies of the Gedrose, the Arachotë, the Aria, and the Paropamisadë, the River Cophes thus forming the extreme boundary of India. According to other writers, however, all these territories, are reckoned as belonging to the country of the Aria”! According to Romila Thapar, “Of the mercenaries, not an insubstantial number were Indians (obviously natives of Sistan ) and, presumably, Hindus. Indian soldiers under their commander, referred to as Suvendhary, remained loyal to Mahmud. They had their own commander, the sipasalar-i-Hinduwan, lived in their own quarter in Ghazni and continued with their religion. When the Turkish commander of the troops rebelled, the command was given to a Hindu, Tilak, and he is commended for his loyalty. Complaints are made about the severity with which Muslims and Christians were killed by Indian troops fighting for Mahmud in Seistan." During the period of Mahmud of Ghazni, much of the principality of Ghor was converted to Islam. The area was so remote that till the 11th century, it had remained a pagan enclave surrounded by Muslim principalities. It was converted to Islam in the early part of the 12th century after Mahmud raided it. According to Minhaj al-Siraj Juzjani, Amir Suri was captured by Mahmud of Ghazni, made prisoner along with his son and taken to Ghazni, where Amir Suri died. Amir Suri was a great king and most of the territories of Ghor were in his possession. But as most of the inhabitants of Ghor had not yet embraced Islam, It was also the last stronghold of an ancient religion professed by the inhabitants when all their neighbors had become Muhammadan. In the 11th century AD Mahmud of Ghazni defeated the prince of Ghor Ibn–I-Suri, and made him prisoner in a severely contested engagement in the valley of Ahingaran. Ibn-I-Suri is identified a Hindu by the author, who has recorded his overthrow. The Ghurid dynasty was also an indigenous Indian dynasty and arose after the Hindu population of Ghor was converted to Islam and the people Islamised. At the time of the Arab invasion of India which commenced with the invasion of Sistan in 642 A.D., even the area of Afghanistan was an integral part of Hind. In the words of the Persian historian Ahmad Ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri, author of Kitab Futuh al-Buldan ("Book of the Conquests of the Lands") translated by Francis Clark Murgotten as "The Origins of the Islamic State”, “As for ibn-Samurah, he established his rule over everything between Zaranj and Kishsh of the land of al-Hind, and over that part of the region of the road of ar-Rukhkhaj which is between it and the province of ad-Dhawar”. ( The origins of the Islamic State, Part II (1924) page 143 by Murgotten, Francis Clark) The worship of the shrine of Zun which was prevalent in Seistan was also Hindu. In 653-4 AD, an army of around 6,000 Arabs were led by General Abdur Rahman bin Samara and they arrived to the shrine of Zoon in Zamindawar. It is reported that General Abdur Rahman "broke off a hand of the idol and plucked out the rubies which were its eyes in order to persuade the Marzbān of Sīstān of the god's worthlessness." The General explained to the Marzbān: "my intention was to show you that this idol can do neither any harm nor good." The ruler of Seistan or the Zunbils was Zunbil or Ratbil who was the King of al-Hind and ruled over the extensive area comprising Seistan, Zamindavar, Makran and the rest of Sindh. So there was no question of India being “across the border” from Ghazni or “descending into India” as stated in “The Moslem Conquest of India” from “Story of Civilization” by Will & Ariel Durant! In fact the political and cultural realm of Kashmir far transcended the present borders of Kashmir and extended to those areas in India to the west of Kashmir up to the area of Zabul and Zaranj in Sistan or Arachosia which according to Isidorus of Charax, the Parthians called “White India” . Abū Rayḥān Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad Al-Bīrūnī , states in his book India that the coast of India begins with Tiz the capital of Makran. The city of Andrapolis named in the Acts, where Judas Thomas and Abbanes landed in India, has been identified as Sandaruck (one of the ancient Alexandrias) in Baluchistan.

In the great old holy city of Jerusalem in what is now the Republic of Palestine, there is a place called Al-Hindi Serai (Indian lodge or shrine), where presumably Baba Farid lived for many years in the early 13th century, almost 800 years ago. Fariduddin Masud was a great Sufi master who was born in 1175 at a village called Kothewal, 10 km from Multan in the Punjab region in the Near Western part of India.

The Balus had not yet entered Makran but had entered by the eleventh century. Baluchistan was inhabited by Indian communities loosely categorised as Zutt i.e. Jat and the whole of Baluchistan was predominantly non Persian. The Balus migrated from Kaman in northern or Northwestern Persia some time around the tenth century when they appeared in Kirman. Then under pressure from the Seljuks , these nomads they moved eastward and entered India across the Sarhad Range separating India from Persia into Baluchistan where they superimposed themselves upon the indigenous Indian Brahui population and also drove out the other Indian communities. In the 10 the century the Balus were present in Kirman and they infested the Great desert of Persia from their mountain fastness at Qufs. Muqadasi describes them as people with savage faces , evil hearts and neither morals nor manners. They were notorious for their cruelty and indulged in stoning their prisoners to death “as one would a snake , putting a man’s head on a boulder, and beating upon it, till it be crushed in”! Baluchistan is an integral part of India historically since time immemorial.

The fact is that the Muslim clergy in India is still comprised of persons with foreign ancestry and not comprised predominantly of persons who are of Indian ancestry. The Mughal invaders never really Indianised themselves and one of the reasons for the decline and fall of the Mughal Empire was because amongst the nobility, there were two distinct classes viz the Hindustani faction and the Mughal faction. The Mughal faction comprised those whose ancestry was either Irani and Turani and they detested and suspected the Hindustani Muslims and considered themselves superior racially and considered Indian Muslims to be inferior to them and there was a continual struggle for control of power and authority. The Hindustani Muslims comprised of inter alia the Sayyids of Barha, the Afghan nobles, and Khan-i-Dauran, whose ancestors came from Badakhshan in the far north of the India and other indigenous Indian Muslims whose ancestors had been Hindus. The foreign Muslims were arbitrarily called Mughals, but were really either Turani or Irani. The foreign nobles of diverse origin, were opposed as a class to the members of the Hindustani party and as colonizers had a vested interest to ensure that the Indian Muslims did not identify themselves with their brethren fellow Indians professing the Hindu faith lest the same would expose and isolate the Mughal faction and they patronized foreign cultural and religious terminology and vocabulary in order to further their imperialist ambitions. The same status quo continues to this date. The foreign Mughals interrupted the history of India. Had they not invaded, India’s beloved indigenous Lodi dynasty would have obviously eventually reunified the whole of the Sub-continent of India! In the present scenario, the predominant Muslim population in the sub-continent of India are descendants of Hindu converts and belong to the Indo-Aryan ethnicity. Once the predominant Muslim people of the sub-continent of India rediscover their Indo-Aryan ancestry, heritage and ethos, which are all extraneous to their profession of the faith of Islam and their religious beliefs, they will denounce the clergy comprised of persons of foreign ancestry and the Islamic clergy will be Indianised. The phenomenon will be something that will first happen in the sub-continent of India not in India but in Pakistan and when it happens, it will not be under duress or coercion but due to a renaissance and their rediscovery of their Indo-Aryan ancestry, heritage and ethos. .

When Kachchhathivu becomes Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Aksai Chin in Ladakh

When the Government of India prefers an affidavit in the Honourable Supreme Court of India which states that

there was no cession of territory of India, one has to understand the pernicious, morbid and degenerate thought process behind such disturbing actions which might have the propensity to harm India in the long run!

    According to the Government of India, allegedly “no territory belonging to India was ceded nor sovereignty relinquished since the area in question

was in dispute and had never been demarcated.” Therefore, the contention of Ms. Jayalalithaa that Kachchatheevu was ceded to Sri Lanka was not correct and contrary to official records.” 

According to Ms. Jayalalithaa, the Writ Petitioner in W. P. (Civil) No. 561 of 2008, the island of Kachchhathivu was historically part of the Ramnad Raja’s zamindari part of the Madras Presidency, and the same would be borne out by records. 

Kachchhatheevu, was claimed by Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) owing to the jurisdiction exercised by the erstwhile Portuguese and later the British rulers over Sri Lanka from Colombo.  Whereas, the mainland Indian perspective posited itself upon the jurisdiction exercised over it by the Raja of Ramanathapuram.

Delving through the historical accounts, the granting of leases of Kachchhatheevu and its adjacent areas in 1870-1873, 1875, 1880, 1889, by Raja of Ramnad, followed by the Memoirs of the Governor of Ceylon from 1757 to 1762 and the letter of Lt. Governor of Ceylon in 1845, precisely, discloses that the island of Kachchatheevu was per se under the sovereignty of king of Ramnad. Further, it was designated as a ‘vessel State’ under the British India. Further, post-independent India marked it as a territory within the Ramanathapuram district in Tamil Nadu with the survey number of ‘1250’. Moreover, it was also recorded in the ‘Gazetteer- Ramanathapuram’ (published in 1972 by the Government of Tamil Nadu). 

It is the mandated duty of the Honourable Supreme Court of India to peruse and scrutinise all the records and documents which would establish without an iota of doubt that Kachchhathivu was an integral part of Ramnad and hence consequently a part of the State of Tamil Nadu as per Article 1 (3) (a), (b) and (c) read with Schedule 1 of the sacrosanct Constitution of India and part of the territory of India, and for ceding a part of the territory of India, there has to be an amendment of the sacrosanct Constitution of India which is a sine qua non. But for all intents and purposes, the crux of the issue, at the end of the day after everything is said and done  is who does the meek and submissive spineless and shameless government of India represent! Whose cause do they espouse?  Do they represent the people of the Republic of India or do they espouse and facilitate the rogue regime in China? Is it the mandate of the Government of India to hunt and leave no stone unturned to look for elusive and illusive evidence to establish and facilitate the bogus and spurious Chinese territorial claims inside India in particular India's beloved and sacred Aksai Chin in Ladakh, Kashmir? The fact of the matter is that whilst other self-respecting countries would leave no stone unturned and hunt for evidence to prove and establish that a particular area is part of of that country, it is the converse and the other way round insofar as India is concerned! It does not behove the Government of any self-respecting nation to partake in such an outrageous nefarious meek and submissive conduct. India was the country which should have been a permanent member of the Security Council  of the United Nations Organisation with full power of Veto in the place of China, but because of the intransigence and unscrupulousness of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, the membership was gifted in a platter to the Communist regime in China. How the Government of India preferred an affidavit in the Honourable Supreme Court of India pertaining to  India's  Kohinoor diamond in support of the Government of the United Kingdom, or Kachchhatheevu only denotes a regular pattern of habitual mindset and thought process of subservience and servitude. Such an outrageous conduct does not happen anywhere else in the whole world, even in any petty and puny banana republic!  Kohinoor is a case in point! But, it happens in the Republic of India with absolute  impunity! We even

saw the former princely state of Nepal publish an official map claiming parts of the Republic of India. But the  notorious  and insulting  line published by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru in 1954  out of the blue in collusion with the Regime in China pertaining to the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract in northern Kashmir extending from Chhogori Peak K2 in central Kashmir to the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and Dafdar, and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir is yet to be vitiated! 

The fact that there has not yet been any formal demarcation or delineation of the  International Boundary of India with East Turkistan does not give a carte blanche to the dispensation in Dehli to surrender integral and inalienable areas of India like the Sanju-La and Hindu-tash Passes in Aksai Chin in

Ladakh to the Chinese. The purported absence of a formal demarcation or delineation of the  International Boundary of India with East Turkistan is not an excuse, opportunity or ground for the degenerate cowardly Government of India to in collusion with the Regime in China facilitate the ab initio illegal and null and void collusive  surrender of inalienable and integral parts of India. This mindset of subservience and servile submission has been put in place and indoctrinated  into the psyche of the people of India  since the times of one Jawaharlal Nehru! 

     Kachchhathivu has to be seen in the right perspective. Kachchhathivu is all not at all about Kachchhathivu! It is all about the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Aksai Chin in Ladakh, Kashmir. It is per se not at all about Kachchhathivu! There is more to it than meets the eye! It is all about Cis-Kuen

Lun Tract in northern Kashmir extending from Chhogori Peak K2 in central Kashmir to the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and and Dafdar in the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir in Kanjut, and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindutash Passes in northern Kashmir. The sly corrupt and treacherous Regime in Dehli knows that the obnoxious and insulting 1954 line published wilfully and wantonly by the notorious Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru is ab initio illegal and null and void and ultra vires the sacrosanct Constitution of India and non est in Law and is inevitably waiting to be vitiated and undone  and the same is impending and inevitable and just waiting to happen.  When it inevitably happens, there would be a revolution and a denunciation and repudiation of the illegal and criminal act of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru for treason.  So, if the Central Government were to acknowledge the fact that Kachchhathivu was a part of Ramanad as any credible Government of a proud and dignified nation would do and is resolutely expected to do, it would set a precedent and  have a profound bearing,

ramification and repercussion on the nature of response the Centre would have to publish in their affidavit in the Honourable Supreme Court of India in a Public Interest litigation case like Writ Petition (Civil) No. 127 of 2011, P.V.Ravi Chandran Vs. The Union of India and Others, a magnum opus and a case which is sui generis concerning the territorial extent of  the Republic of India pertaining to the treacherous arbitrary and unilateral line published out of the blue by one Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru in 1954 in collusion with the Regime in China as per his pervert whims and fancies as the alleged so-called International Boundary of India with East Turkistan and the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Ladakh in pursuance of which Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru ordered the burning and destruction of numerous invaluable maps published by the Survey of India prior to 1954 pertaining to the period of the commencement of the sacrosanct Constitution of India which depicted Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Aksai Chin in Ladakh, Kashmir and depicted the International Boundary of India with East Turkistan on the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir wherein are the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir. 

     Hence, the meek and submissive Government of India would have to necessarily resort to treacherous lies and obfuscation in order to extricate and wriggle out of the sordid mess wantonly and wilfully created by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru in collusion with the Regime in China for which Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru ought to have been tried for treason, as an act of their chronic and habitual subservience and Servitude vis-à-vis the Regime in China! 

Controversy pertaining to Jana Gana Mana

"A controversy is going on whether Tagore wrote ' Jana Gana Mana ' in honour of the British King George the Fifth who visited India in 1911. In this connection I had supported this view in my fb post and blog, giving my reasons. Those who wish to refute me should point out the flaws in my reasoning. You cannot demolish a reasoned argument by mere assertions without giving reasons. So I am reproducing my post, and

invite reasoned comments", says His Lordship,  Honourable Justice Markanday Katju in his website blog, "Satyam Bruyat"  to which I had posted my  invincible  comment therein possibly dated 11, May 2015.

Though the song was purportedly composed by Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore in December 1911, welcoming and honouring King George v at the time of the Coronation Durbar of George V, and "Bharata Bhagya vidhata" and "Adhinayaka" is in fact in praise of ...King George V and not God and though the song was composed prior to the arbitrary and artificial partition of India in 1947, except for the isolated reference to Sindh, the song does not cover the geography and length and breadth of India adequately. There is neither a reference to the western province of Baluchistan in its entirety including the occupied western portion of the western province of Baluchistan,  Roh, Gandhara in northwestern India  nor  Nepal or Assam or Kamarupa or Pragjyothisha, or Manipur, or Raksapura with her capital Dhanyawadi. On the other hand, reference to some of the regions has been repetitive. For example, since there is already a reference to the Ganga basin, there need not have been a reference to Bengal. Instead, pre-partitioned Assam as the easternmost part of India ought to have been referred to. Or since there is already a reference to the Yamuna basin, Gañga, a mere tributary of the Yamuna need not have been referred to and instead the mighty Brahmaputra  ought to have been referred to. There is no reference to the Hindu Kush or Rohita, the mountain massif fastness of Roh or Afghanistan and the  reference to the Himalayas is vague and the name “Himachal” seems to be used more in the nature of a political context, i.e. the State of Himachal Pradesh or a section of the Himalayas and does not inspire confidence, rather than the entire Great Himalayan Ãrch of the  great Himalaya mountain ranges spiraling in northern India from the Kuen Lun Range in the  northern part of the highlands of Kashmir wherein are the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes 36°26'00"N 78°46'39"E in Aksai Chin in Ladakh to the Lagya pass in the Assam Himalaya! There is no reference to the southern islands including the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, the Lakshadvipa extending to the Chagos Archipelago and Diego Garcia, Sukhadhara Dvipa, and  the legendary mythical Lañka. It seems as though, the partition of India was foreseen and the song deliberately avoided reference to areas which would cease to remain integral part of India after the arbitrary and artificial partition of India in pursuance to the diabolical conspiracy and game plan of the colonial English to give a final slap in the face of the Indians before Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National Army unceremoniously threw and drove them out of the sprawling Sub-continent of India in its entirety!

The purview and ambit of the State of Pakistan

A prominent Pakistani filmmaker, Adeel Afzal, has on a YouTube channel Mosiki bemoaned the fact that India and Pakistan are engaged in an arms race at the cost of the economic conditions of the ordinary people of both the Countries. While the views have been expressed in good faith and with good intentions, Pakistan cannot compare, compete and equate itself with India and try to compete with India in every way possible. For one, at the end of the day after everything is said and done, Pakistan, at best is just a temporary local regional power and entity, whilst India is a global power on par with Russia, United States of America and China and will play a dominant part in the world geopolitics and geo-strategy. Pakistan is no longer a factor in India's development of technology vis-à-vis weapons for offence and defense. Even India's Maurya Empire under Devanampriya Ashoka, the Great, the proponent of peace maintained a huge standing army to protect our sovereignty and territorial integrity. Some Pakistanis think of every research in India pertaining to development of indigenous weapons of offence and defense are meant for use against Pakistan and view everything India does through the prism of threat to Pakistan. India's Intercontinental Range ballistic missile, Agni with a range of 12,000 km for example is meant to traverse Tibet and enter China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Manchuria, Europe or North America! Pakistan is not at all a factor! Pakistan was created by the English as a part of their geostrategic game plan to subvert India's progress to become a global power. It is an ad hoc temporary "fake" entity. Pakistan is a spoil sport and meant to stand in the way of India's progress. It has by design and default no other purpose or role envisaged to play. Pakistanis are pawns and are inadvertently playing into the game plan of these imperialistic powers. Eventually there is going to be a renaissance in Pakistan and the people of Pakistan  are going to recognise their Indian ancestry and their Indo- Aryan Indic heritage and ethos.  Pakistan is a sleeping giant which when aroused from slumber will eventually take over the reins of a re-unified India or South Asia! It is something inevitable and just waiting to happen!  We have to prevent the Balkanisation of Pakistan and the creation of any new bogus and spurious new so-called sovereign states particularly in the western province of Baluchistan in Pakistan, particularly after East Pakistan. Already, there is a covert game-plan by powers hostile and inimical to India and her eventual rise to become a super power at a time when India is spiraling towards re-unification, to create a spurious and bogus so-called sovereign state of Baluchistan which shall not be permitted, not withstanding all the endeavour of persons with ulterior motives and diabolical vested interests of the likes of Mr. Tarek Fatah whose pet theme is the so-called independence for the western province of Baluchistan is per se in collusion with powers which are inimical to India becoming a reunified powerful nation. Inevitably, in the long run there will be a revolution in Pakistan and the proud people of Pakistan would rise up and denounce and repudiate the two nation theory and call for the re-unification of India. It is not about Pakistan! Pakistan is a spoilsport created and designed  as a game plan to come in the way of India when it comes to the legitimate rights of India in world affairs. Look how Pakistan is standing in the way of India's absolute and unconditional right to be a part of the permanent 5 of the United Nations Organisation with full power of Veto! Imagine a re-unified India which has a stupendous population professing Islam, an India which is a permanent member of the Permanent Four of The Security Council of the United Nations Organisation with full Power of Veto, an India which has no Kashmir dispute since the whole of the sub-continent of India or South Asia is politically re-united as one country, the way it ought to have been all along. As I understand, Pakistan was solely  created in 1947 as a part of an international conspiracy to deny India her right, role and privilege as a world superpower and a country the Islamic nations could look up for support in the world International affairs! 

To put things in perspective, the actual real issue is that the entire Sub-continent of India comprising the countries of South Asia is one organic entity and India as per the present artificial political borders after the artificial arbitrary and unilateral partition of the Sub-continent of India and the failure to integrate all the Princely States in India into the Union of India in 1947 is not viable and even if the Government of India were to somehow liberate the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir comprising inter alia Baltistan, Kanjut, Gilgit and Chilas and integrate the area, we still would have to necessarily get the help of the Government of Pakistan and the Army of Pakistan to drive away and throw the Chinese out of the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract in northern Kashmir extending from Chhogori Peak K2 and Shingshal in the interior of Kashmir in central Kashmir to the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and Dafdar in the northernmost part of the Republic of India and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir including Aksai Chin in Ladakh extending from the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Ladakh as the entire Sub-continent of India is inherently and intrinsically a single organic entity incapable of severance or Partition of its per se organic part, and the entire Sub-continent of India is designed  and inherently and intrinsically conceived to be a single political nation state and entity to be viable and  not the numerous countries which comprise the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).

Insofar as the  missiles which India has herself indigenously designed and developed, it pertains to our geostrategic security threat from distant far away China in East Asia which has militarily Occupied our historical neighbouring countries, inter alia Tibet and East Turkistan, and the Chinese are in occupation of the area adjacent and adjoining the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Kashmir including India's beloved Aksai Chin 36°27'44"N 78°45'24"E in Ladakh and the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir and Chinese are claiming vast areas of India including the Assam Himalaya. Pakistan has also  illegally given away vast inalienable parts of India in the area of Gilgit, Kanjut and Baltistan in the north western state of Jammu and Kashmir to the sly opportunistic Chinese in 1962 for their purported support. We already suffered in 1962 and India needs to be ready for any misadventure by the Chinese! In any case India's weapons presently are far inferior to Chinese military prowess and India desperately needs to develop her capabilities and be on par with the Chinese to enable India to drive away and throw the Chinese out of Tibet, the next time they try to engage in any misadventure. Pakistan is just a local regional power of no consequence  unlike India which will rise to become an international world power and Pakistan should not and cannot compare itself with India's own security concerns and global aspirations! Pakistan should understand its own inconsequential role and limitations as a temporary ad hoc small local regional entity and cannot aspire to compare its security capabilities with India's own! And ah, the speaker has forgotten to say that the Chinese are wasting their limited resources which can be better utilised for the betterment of their populations! It all has to do with the fact that at the end of the day, Pakistan is a spurious creation. Notwithstanding the best intentions of Jinnah, when he created a state for the first time in the world on the basis of the religious beliefs of Indians, it sent the ball rolling. It was pre-ordained! One thing leads to another. It happens with clockwork precision and cannot be averted or prevented. That is how all the minorities including the Hindus, Bengalis, Baluch, Ahmadi Muslims, Kachchhi, Hazaras came to be discriminated. The chain reaction or domino effect is inevitable and the end result will play itself out eventually to its logical conclusion, not withstanding the sane voices of the minority intellectuals and academics! There is only one way, only one way to stop the domino effect and that is to nip it at the source! So there!

There is nothing exceptional about Kashmir!

There is nothing exceptional about Kashmir. There were princely states in the length and breadth of India from Makran or Kharan in the western province of Baluchistan in western India to Manipur in eastern India or from Gilgit and Kanjut in Kashmir in northern India to Thiruvithamkoor in southern India. The option of independence was not available to any of the princely states. What is exceptional about Kashmir alone? The so-called Kashmir issue is a freak and artificial one which is the result of the arbitrary and artificial partition of India and the callousness of Mr Jawaharlal Nehru and his wilful inaction regarding the enforcement of the accession of the princely state of Kashmir to the Union of India and rather lodging a foolish complaint in the United Nations Organisation without the prior eviction of the invaders or raiders from Pakistan. Nor did Kashmir become a  condominium! Mr.Jawaharlal Nehru should have either permitted Pakistan to integrate the whole of predominantly Muslim Kashmir in its entirety into Pakistan, or he should have enforced the perfectly legal and valid legal accession of the whole of the princely state of Kashmir which comprises inter alia Gilgit, Kanjut, Baltistan, Ladakh, Mirpur, Chilas, the valley of Kashmir and Jammu in its entirety to the Union of India. But, Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru being Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru did neither! Even if the either had been done, then again there is a problem. It verily needed a vast strong united India with all the full strength which she could command to protect the external northern frontier of a geo-strategic province like Kashmir with the Trans- Kuen Lun Range country

of East Turkistan annexed by the Chinese. Neither the Pakistanis nor the Indians of the post 1947 partition moth-eaten India could do it on their own simply because only a big strong united country could do it!  It was to circumvent this handicap or impediment that President Field Marshal Ayub Khan  suggested a military alliance in the nature of a Common Joint defence for both India and Pakistan in the year 1959. The partition  of India itself was intrinsically and inherently flawed and morally wrong as the Sub-continent of India is a single organic living entity which cannot be amputated or divided or partitioned into two distinct beings or entities! Thus the so-called Kashmir issue was created, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that intrinsically or inherently Kashmir is a part of India just like any other part of India. Nothing more, nothing less! By India, I mean the historical nation of India prior to 1947 of which Kashmir or Baluchistan are an organic part, and not the moth-eaten present artificial borders like the Durand or Radcliffe Lines after the 1947 partition. The reason for the so-called Kashmir issue is thus per se extraneous and has nothing whatsoever to do with intrinsic status of the province of Kashmir itself. Article 370 of the Constitution of India is no artificial gum or glue which will indefinitely and permanently bond two mutually distinct & incompatible items. It was never ever required. Either Kashmir is intrinsically & inherently a part of India which Kashmir per se is and Kashmir will remain an inalienable and sacred part of India without the requirement of an artificial glue or an adhesive or conversely, if a territory is per se incompatible and not intrinsically and inherently a part of India, no artificial glue or adhesive in the nature of Article 370 of the Constitution of India can retain the territory  with the rest of India and the area would simply be a possession or colony rather than an organic part of India which Kashmir per se inherently and intrinsically is! Ultimately, the issue is whether the right to the nationhood of India can be permitted to be challenged and India be subjected to Balkanisation by whosoever or the nationhood of India be vindicated and whether the idea of India has to be preserved and protected for posterity!

India is destined to remain friend-less and alone

 The United States Deputy National Security Advisor, Daleep Singh is absolutely right that come-what-may,

the Russians would only support the Chinese in their territorial claims in India including the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir extending from Chhogori K2 to the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir, or Aksai Chin 36°40'36"N 78°21'33"E in Ladakh. The issue is

whether the United States is going to unconditionally and absolutely  support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of India vis-à-vis India's beloved and sacred inalienable Aksai Chin 36°40'36"N 78°21'33"E in Ladakh and whether their official  and government maps would depict Aksai Chin in Ladakh as per se an integral and inalienable part of India and not a so-called disputed territory, in exchange for India's friendship and support! The answer is a big resounding no! The United States regime would also support the Chinese in their territorial claims inside India in particular Aksai Chin in Ladakh, not because Aksai Chin is allegedly a so-called disputed territory, but because of their ulterior vested interests and diabolical game-plan.  Aksai Chin is per se a part of Ladakh and status of  Aksai Chin as integral part of India is non-compromisable. The fact is that India has no friends and India is all alone and destined to be alone and friendless, and has to be strong and powerful, for her defence or offence, to on her own drive away and throw the Chinese out of India's beloved and sacred inalienable Aksai Chin  36°40'36"N 78°21'33"E in Ladakh  and the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir in the inevitable and impending war with the Rogue Chinese regime, and also to defend herself from threats to her

sovereignty and territorial integrity from the Russians and Americans vis-à-vis the Chagos Archipelago in Lakshadvipa 6°40'07"S 71°19'48"E  in southeastern India. But the fact of the matter is that whichever government is in power in India, be it the Congress Government or the BJP government, the government of India is meek, submissive, subservient and servile and the

people of India rather than becoming modern, secular, irreligious and progressive nationalists are with the tacit support of the present dispensation gradually  undergoing a metamorphosis and predominantly fast being converted to become perverse narrow-minded communal and fascists nurturing a  visceral Islamophobia which imperils and threatens the predominantly peaceful Indian Muslims with genocide and annihilation!

Two ab initio illegal unilateral and arbitrary actions in 1954 in India and the Russian Federation respectively which resulted in the per se illegal diminution of the territorial extent of India and the Russian Federation, and how the two states responded to the illegality in the long run

 

In the year 1954 there were two momentous  arbitrary and unilateral  decisions  taken which are per se ab initio illegal and null and void and non est in law which resulted in the per se illegal diminution of the territorial extent of the Republic of India,  as well as  the  Russian Federation. 

On April 26, 1954 There was a decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet transferring the Crimea Oblast from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.

According to a 2009 article on Russian website “Pravda”, the Presidium of the Supreme Council gathered for a session on 19 February 1954 when only 13 of 27 members were present. There was no quorum, but the decision was adopted unanimously. 

The transfer merited only a paragraph in Pravda, the official Soviet newspaper, on Feb. 27, 1954. The story was one long sentence and dense with detail. Here is what it said:

"Decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme

Soviet transferring Crimea Province from the Russian Republic to the Ukraine Republic, taking into account the integral character of the economy, the territorial proximity and the close economic ties between Crimea Province and the Ukraine Republic, and approving the joint presentation of the Presidium of the Russian Republic Supreme Soviet and the Presidium of the Ukraine Republic Supreme Soviet on the transfer of Crimea Province from the Russian Republic to the Ukraine Republic."

And with that, a region that had been purportedly "part of Russia for centuries" was "gifted" to Ukraine. "Gifted" because Khrushchev's transfer was ostensibly to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's merger with the Russian empire. And he probably didn't think the Soviet Union would disintegrate less than 40 years later.

But, asks Lewis Siegelbaum, a historian at Michigan State University, "what motivated such generosity?" Writing on the website Seventeen Moments In Soviet History, he says:

"After all, Crimea, the rugged peninsula jutting into the Black Sea, had not become territorially contiguous with Ukraine all of a sudden."

Siegelbaum argues that Crimea's cultural links with Russia were far stronger, and, at the time, there were slightly more than three Russians in Crimea for each Ukrainian. (Stalin had expelled the entire local Tatar population a decade earlier.)

Khrushchev informed his comrades of the decision to deliver Crimea to Ukraine incidentally, on the way to lunch. “Yes, comrades, there is an opinion to deliver Crimea to Ukraine,” he said casually. No one dared to express any protests, because a word of the first face of the Communist Party was law.

The agenda of the session of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which took place January 25, 1954, contained a question about the delivery of the Crimean region to the structure of the Ukrainian SSR. The discussion of the question took only 15 minutes. The participants of the meeting approved the decree, and the region was given away to Ukraine for free in a platter and for a song!

Not a single protest was made; no one had any doubts about the decision. No one wondered how the population (presumably the predominant Russian-speaking population, given the en masde expulsion and deportation of the indigenous  obviously acculturated Crimean Tatars) of Crimea would treat the decision. It turned out that such important issues as the territorial movement of regions could be solved without any difficulties at all.

The question ought to have been submitted to the open discussion of the Supreme Council of the Russian SSR. Moreover, a referendum should have been conducted to find out the opinion of the residents of the two republics. Nothing of that happened. The Presidium of the Supreme Council gathered for a session on February 19, 1954 - only 13 of 27 members were present. There was no quorum, but the decision was adopted unanimously. The Supreme Council of Russia ruled in 1992 that the Crimean region had been delivered to Ukraine illegitimately.

The earlier published documents and materials that have emerged more recently confirm that the transfer of Crimea from the Russian SFSR to the Ukrainian SSR was carried out in accordance with the 1936 Soviet constitution, which in Article 18 stipulated that "the territory of a Union Republic may not be altered without its consent." The proceedings of the USSR Supreme Soviet Presidium meeting indicate that both the Russian SFSR and the Ukrainian SSR had given their consent via their republic parliaments. 

On 27 June 2015, after the so-called "annexation" of Crimea by the Russian Federation, the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation accepted the request of the leader of A Just Russia party, Sergey Mironov, to evaluate the legitimacy of 1954 transfer of Crimea and stated that the transfer violated both the Constitution of the Russian SFSR and the Constitution of the Soviet Union. The text of the document signed by Russian Deputy Prosecutor General Sabir Kekhlerov stated: "Neither the Constitution of the RSFSR or the USSR Constitution provide powers of the Presidium Supreme Soviet of the USSR for the consideration of the changes in the constitutional legal status of the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, members of the union republics. In view of the above, the decision adopted in 1954 by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviets of the RSFSR and the Soviet on the transfer of the Crimean region of the RSFSR to the USSR, did not correspond to the Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the RSFSR and the Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the USSR." 

In January 1992, the Supreme Soviet of Russia questioned the constitutionality of the transfer, accusing Nikita Khrushchev of treason against the Russian people and said that the transfer was illegitimate. Alexander Rutskoy, the former Vice President of Russia, said that this was a “harebrained scheme” for which Khrushchev was famous saying that those who signed the document must have been suffering from sunstroke or hangovers.

Thus when it comes to Russia, there has been a voracious endeavour by Russian Nationalist academicians and intellectuals  to quite rightly denounce and repudiate the illegal transfer of Crimea in 1954 from the Russian Federation to Ukraine and undo and set-aside  the whole exercise  and procedure by vitiating it legally as non est in law  and also politically. That is what is to be expected of a proud and self-respecting nation whose conduct is not one of subservience and being  servile and meek.

Now coming to India,  again in the very same

year, 1954 one notorious Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, in collusion with the Chinese  published out of the blue,  an ab initio illegal, bogus and spurious, insulting fraudulent map which is per se ultra vires the sacrosanct Constitution of India and non est in law which ceased  to depict vast areas of the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir extending from the Shingshal Valley and Chhogori Peak K2 8611 metres in central Kashmir to Dafdar, Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and The Raskam Tract, and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, and Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir as part of India and consequently resulted in the illegal cartographical cession of the aforesaid integral parts of India resulting in the illegal diminution of the territorial extent of India as a gift to the Chinese. There has been no chest beating. No hoarse cry! Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru accomplished the work he set out to do with precision for a song, just like that! 

Two maps, viz. The official maps attached to the

White Papers published in July 1948 and February 1950 by the Government of India's Ministry of States, headed, incidentally, by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, under the authority of India's Surveyor General G.F.Heaney pertaining to the period of the commencement of the sacrosanct Constitution of India give them the legal status to determine the extent of the State of Kashmir as stipulated in Entry 15 in the First Schedule of the Constitution on India. The said official maps presented with the White Papers prove that the northern border of Kashmir with East Turkistan at the time of the accession of the state to the Union of India was on the Kuen Lun Range, the natural and historic border of Kashmir with neighbouring Trans-Kuen Lun State of East Turkistan.

Pertinently, it is imperative to note that areas shown in colour including the Kashmiri Town of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir in the aforesaid maps are illegally not depicted as part of Kashmir by the present office of the Surveyor General of India presently in consonance with the bogus and spurious map published  by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru in collusion with the Chinese. 

The Government of Kashmir had in exercise of its territorial sovereignty built a fort in the historical northern Kashmiri town of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir to command the Kuen Lun  range  and to regulate and control these Kirghiz vagabond and criminal thugs. 

In June 1954, Zhou Enlai, Prime Minister of China was in India, and in the October of the same year Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru went to China. In between, Nehru issued a memorandum which stated inter alia that the frontier should be considered a firm and definite one, which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should be spread along this entire frontier. As was seen later, this lie  perpetrated on the Indian Nation  which was the pretext for this collusive bogus and false map of 1954 was tested and proved to be a lie in 1959. The  Alleged purpose of the 1954 Nehru Line was that the  "Frontier should be considered a firm and definite one, which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should  be spread along this entire frontier". The spurious and bogus reason for the publication of this illegal map can  be inferred from what happened in 1959! 

In 1959, The Director of the Intelligence

Bureau , B.N. Mullik recommended the setting of new posts in Kashmir, at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol and Palong Karpo  verily in consonance with the alleged rationale behind the per se illegal and null and void map of  1954 depicting the Nehru Line  is discussed in January 1959 at a meeting in the External Affairs Ministry in the presence of Gen. Thimayya, Chief of the Army staff and the Foreign Secretary, Mr. Subimal Dutt, who was a part of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru's coterie.  Both the Army Chief and the Foreign Secretary  opposed the proposal to open border posts at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol  because according to them, the opening of the said posts would ‘provoke’ the Chinese, and create tension and “this part of the territory was useless to India", thus  debunking for ever the fraudulent reason for publishing the ab initio illegal  bogus and spurious map in 1954. Unlike much of the Russian Empire which was created by conquest, acquisition and deportation of the aboriginal indigenous population, particularly in annexed Crimea and the annihilation of Circassia, the whole of Aksai Chin including the Ngari Khor-sum extending to the ridges separating the plateau of Tibet from the Highlands of Kashmir on which are the Aling Kangri and the Mawang Kangri peaks, in Ladakh was historically per se part of Ladakh pure and simple even before the marauding Tibetans from the east reached the frontiers of Maryul in Kashmir and there was nothing whatsoever to discuss with the Chinese about this. Aksai Chin was per se not a disputed territory. It is non-negotiable! There is nothing whatsoever to discuss with the Chinese about Aksai Chin. It is per se a part of India pure and simple. 

If there had been well-informed and proud nationalist Indians, there would have been an outrage and a revolution and India would have denounced and repudiated Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru for treason and condemned him for his criminal actions against India and India would have undone the illegality and restored India's historical International Boundary with the sovereign state of East Turkistan on the Kuen Lun Range which is inevitably waiting to happen. 

On 04.04.2011, one Writ Petition (Civil) No. 127 of 2011, P.V.Ravi Chandran Vs. The Union of India and Others preferred as a public interest litigation by an Advocate hailing from Ponani, Bharata Pužha, Malappuram, Kerala practicing in the Honourable High Court of Madras, P.V.Ravi Chandran came up for hearing in the Honourable Supreme Court of India. It was a sui generis case wherein in addition to the Union of India, the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Survey of India were arrayed as parties, and was profound in its significance and ramifications and had enough merits and was a magnum opus that it would have been not just admitted during admission but also even allowed in limine as prayed for had it been any other country. It was an opportunity to save India like never before and just in time and was waiting to happen and the Apex Court ought to have seized the opportunity. Instead, the Apex Court dismissed it in a single line order, not on merits and hence there is no res judicata, and without hearing the party- in - person and with false observation that the Petitioner had been heard, which was in the first place a lie.

Writ Petition  (Civil) No. 127 of 2011, P.V.Ravi Chandran Vs. The Union of India and Others, dated 04.04.2011 was dismissed with an oral observation that  the Petitioner therein could give a complaint or representation which in fact  had already been  meticulously done and exhausted. It was per se a fraudulent, dishonest, deceitful and treacherous and a corrupt judgement based on altogether extraneous considerations which were not germane to the merits of the case, and the oral observations did not even feature in the printed  copy of the judgement received by the Petitioner therein and was obiter dictum. The issue is that the upper Indian Judiciary right from the Honourable Supreme Court of India is all powerful and not accountable and some of the Honourable Judges can do as they please in accordance with their perverse whims and fancies and are bereft of morals, integrity or convictions, and where does a small person like the Petitioner therein fit in the scheme of things?

India is per se a subservient and servile state  whose population has been effectively emasculated and rendered effeminate in a process and procedure set in motion, and laid in place established and consolidated by the notorious Jawaharlal Nehru regime in India since १९४७! The three wings of the State, are irredeemably corrupt and cannot be redeemed in the present scenario. 

But we Indians are in the first place ignorant and oblivious about map reading and understanding our country's borders depicted in maps. Secondly, we do not feel angry, outraged, indignant, upset, or repulsive when the borders of India are depicted wrongly and incorrectly by Pro-Chinese agencies like Wikipedia or even the so-called Indian Press media, and we do not hold massive rallies and demonstrations  and demand that the publishers be punished and the company or publisher like the notorious Hindu, India's Anti-national Newspaper, be stormed, confiscated and  shut down. This is because we were manipulated to be a meek, submissive, subservient, effeminate and emasculated people by policies which were put in place by the notorious Jawaharlal Nehru! To sum up, we  are programmed and designed over a period of time to be utterly shameless! We lost that martial spirit of Ashfaqullah Khan or Bhagat Singh after  the scheming, conniving  regime of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru who was verily an wolf in sheep's clothing who ran with the hare & hunted with the hounds, in collusion with the Chinese took over & converted India into a nation full of effeminate and emasculated Indians!