The National Security Adviser, Mr.Ajit Doval said on
May 24 that the undefined borders in the west
and north have adversely affected the country
and that India’s economic progress would
have been much faster “if we had more secure borders.” He
says that a large area
of Kashmir in the west is occupied by Pakistan but he does not similarly say that a large
area of Kashmir is occupied by the Chinese
in the north, but instead rather says that
“India shares an undefined border with "China" in the north”. “If both our
borders, in north and west had been defined and not in state of adversarial
disposition, India’s economic progress would have been much faster if we had
more secure borders and in future I don’t think that our borders are going to
be as secure as we will require for our fast economic growth.
So what is Mr. Ajit Doval inferring?
So according to Mr. Ajit
Doval, India for India’s economic progress, should have secure borders by
giving away the areas in Kashmir like India’s beloved Aksai Chin in Ladakh and
the Cis Kuen Lun Tract extending from the Shingshal and the Chhogori K2 Peak in central Kashmir to the
Taghdumbash Pamir & Mariom Pamir & Dafdar, & the Kukalang, Yangi,
Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes 36°27'01"N 78°46'59"E in
northern Kashmir under Chinese military occupation in a platter and convert the
Ceasefire line into the alleged so-called secure international Boundary!
What gibberish is Ajit Doval inferring? Is he saying that just because the International
Boundary is undefined and allegedly in a state of adversarial disposition, in order to have
"secure" borders, India should give Aksai Chin 36°26'06"N
78°46'49"E in Ladakh in a platter
to the Chinese? That in order to have "secure" borders, India
should give Aksai Chin 36°26'06"N 78°46'49"E in Ladakh & the
Cis-Kuen Lun Tract in Kashmir in a platter to the Chinese occupying India's
neighbouring sovereign countries, just because the Chinese are claiming it though Aksai Chin is not at all a disputed territory by any stretch of imagination whatsoever and is per se
historically an integral and inalienable part of Ladakh, Kashmir since time immemorial.
This is a repeat of what transpired in 1954. Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru visited China in 1954
and he in the same year unilaterally
and arbitrarily made ab initio illegal changes to the International Boundary of India for
the alleged reason of securing a firm and definite international boundary. In
between, Nehru issued a memorandum of July 1, 1951 ( SWJN ; Volume 26, page 477). which stated inter alia that the frontier
should be considered a firm and definite one, which is not open to discussion
with any one. A system of check posts should be spread along this
entire frontier. Precious old Survey Of India maps which depicted Sanju-la and Hindutash Passes in Aksai Chin in Ladakh, Kashmir were summarily arbitrarily and unilaterally burnt to facilitate the Chinese! The fallacious logic and reasoning claimed and alleged by Mr. Jawaharlal
Nehru was that the border should "be firm and definite one, which is
not
open to discussion with any one", but his vile fraudulent and dishonest collusive intentions were soon to be exposed and laid bare eventually. Pertinently, it is imperative
to note that the Director of the Intelligence Bureau , B.N. Mullik had
recommended the setting of new posts in Kashmir in 1959, at inter alia Sarigh
Jilganang Kol and Palong Karpo which was discussed in January 1959 at a meeting
in the external affairs Ministry in the presence of Gen Thimayya, Chief of the
Army staff and the notorious Foreign secretary, Mr. Ratan Kumar Nehru. Both the Army Chief and the Foreign
Secretary had opposed the proposal to open border posts at inter alia Sarigh
Jilganang Kol though Sarigh Jilganang Kol was situate deep inside Kashmir even
according to the obnoxious conservative ‘Nehru Line’ published out of the blue
in 1954 by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru
because according to them, the opening of the
said posts would ‘provoke’ the Chinese , and create tension. The attitude of
the External Affairs Ministry (hear, hear) was that “this part of the territory
was useless to India. Even if the Chinese did not encroach into it , India
could not make any use of it . The boundary had not been demarcated and had been shifted more than once by the British”. (Mullik , The Chinese Betrayal, page
204). Now, Mr. Ajit Doval obviously wants to further shift the so called "secure border" from the Yangi Davan Pass to the east of Haji Langar or Palong Ri and
Cholpanglik in Aksai Chin in Ladakh which was the secure border as per the ab initio
illegal and null and void and ultra vires the sacrosanct Constitution of India, and non est in law 1954 line published by Mr.
Jawaharlal Nehru in collusion with the regime in China to the present Cease Fire Line
along the Galwan and Shyok Rivers in
western Ladakh to facilitate India’s economic progress and growth.
Well, Mr. Ajit Doval, If the
International borders in the northwest are undefined, then
India should demarcate
the International Boundary of India with East Turkistan on the watershed of
the Kuen Lun Range in Raskam, Kashmir as done by me. India should hold
talks with the de jure Government of the Chinese Occupied Sovereign state of East Turkistan
and demarcate the International Boundary of India with East Turkistan on
the water shed of the Kuen Lun Range wherein are the Taghdumbash Pamir &
Mariom Pamir & Dafdar, the northernmost point in the Republic of India
& the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes
36°27'01"N 78°46'59"E in northern Kashmir & make the boundary precise, not vague
& unambiguous and the limit to India’s sovereignty and territorial
integrity is unambiguous and precise. The de jure Government of East Turkistan has already gone on record by stating that Aksai Chin is a part of India and
they do not claim Aksai Chin and that the Johnson Line is recognized by East
Turkistan as the International Boundary of East Turkistan with India.
Ajit Doval gives his own pernicious fantastic definition of sovereignty and territorial integrity of India. It is per se outright
anti-national and seditious and amounts to treason. It is fraught with impending ominous danger and a disaster waiting to happen. The ceasefire line of Line
of Actual Control does not
define India’s sovereignty and territorial
integrity. The actual de jure International Boundary of India with Chinese
Occupied East Turkistan on the Taghdumbash Pamir
& Mariom Pamir, and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and
Hindu-tash Passes 36°27'01"N 78°46'59"E in northern Kashmir defines
the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India and for Mr. Ajit Doval to
say otherwise is treason and he should to sacked for treason and for imperiling
India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and the sacrosanct Constitution
of India. According to Mr. Ajit Doval, “borders are
important because that is the limit which defines our sovereignty. Up to the
last point where our border soldier is able to go and put his foot down, that
is the limit of our sovereignty, zameen par jo kabja hai wo apna hai,
baaki sab adalat aur kacheri ka kaam hai, usse fark nahin padta (what
matters are the areas where we can establish our claim physically, the rest is
a legal matter for the courts, and does not make a difference).“ According to him,
"The land which is in our possession is ours; the rest is a matter for courts and is immaterial”. Thus is per se treason. The de jure border is material and it is the Line of Actual Control and the Cease Fireline which has absolutely no sanctity and basis and should be treated with the contempt it deserves and summarily be ignored and all endeavour should be for driving away and throwing the Chinese out of Aksai Chin and the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract, and Mr. Ajit Doval apparently prefers to convert the ab initio illegal and null and void Ceasefire Line or the Line of Actual Control into the alleged so called International Boundary.
“We got to see whether the border on northern
or western side, they not only determine the limits of our sovereignty, not
only important for our territorial integrity, they also have an impact on our
internal security and stability,” the NSA said.
His statement that sovereignty extends only "Up
to the last point where our border soldier is able to go and put his foot
down" is per se false mischievous collusive seditious anti-national act for
which the Government of India should
take punitive action against him for treason and sedition. Such a person like Mr. Ajit Doval is
unfit and incompetent for holding the post of National Security Advisor (NSA).
He is per se imperiling the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India and
he should be summarily be removed and terminated for treason by the Government of India.
But the more ominous issue is whether this present dispensation at all has the inclination to protect India’s sovereignty and
territorial integrity and is actually hand in glove with him and tacitly supporting Mr. Ajit Doval who may be actually acting at the behest and instance of the subservient and servile present dispensation in Dehli!
