Controversy pertaining to Jana Gana Mana

"A controversy is going on whether Tagore wrote ' Jana Gana Mana ' in honour of the British King George the Fifth who visited India in 1911. In this connection I had supported this view in my fb post and blog, giving my reasons. Those who wish to refute me should point out the flaws in my reasoning. You cannot demolish a reasoned argument by mere assertions without giving reasons. So I am reproducing my post, and

invite reasoned comments", says His Lordship,  Honourable Justice Markanday Katju in his website blog, "Satyam Bruyat"  to which I had posted my  invincible  comment therein possibly dated 11, May 2015.

Though the song was purportedly composed by Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore in December 1911, welcoming and honouring King George v at the time of the Coronation Durbar of George V, and "Bharata Bhagya vidhata" and "Adhinayaka" is in fact in praise of ...King George V and not God and though the song was composed prior to the arbitrary and artificial partition of India in 1947, except for the isolated reference to Sindh, the song does not cover the geography and length and breadth of India adequately. There is neither a reference to the western province of Baluchistan in its entirety including the occupied western portion of the western province of Baluchistan,  Roh, Gandhara in northwestern India  nor  Nepal or Assam or Kamarupa or Pragjyothisha, or Manipur, or Raksapura with her capital Dhanyawadi. On the other hand, reference to some of the regions has been repetitive. For example, since there is already a reference to the Ganga basin, there need not have been a reference to Bengal. Instead, pre-partitioned Assam as the easternmost part of India ought to have been referred to. Or since there is already a reference to the Yamuna basin, Gañga, a mere tributary of the Yamuna need not have been referred to and instead the mighty Brahmaputra  ought to have been referred to. There is no reference to the Hindu Kush or Rohita, the mountain massif fastness of Roh or Afghanistan and the  reference to the Himalayas is vague and the name “Himachal” seems to be used more in the nature of a political context, i.e. the State of Himachal Pradesh or a section of the Himalayas and does not inspire confidence, rather than the entire Great Himalayan Ãrch of the  great Himalaya mountain ranges spiraling in northern India from the Kuen Lun Range in the  northern part of the highlands of Kashmir wherein are the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes 36°26'00"N 78°46'39"E in Aksai Chin in Ladakh to the Lagya pass in the Assam Himalaya! There is no reference to the southern islands including the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, the Lakshadvipa extending to the Chagos Archipelago and Diego Garcia, Sukhadhara Dvipa, and  the legendary mythical Lañka. It seems as though, the partition of India was foreseen and the song deliberately avoided reference to areas which would cease to remain integral part of India after the arbitrary and artificial partition of India in pursuance to the diabolical conspiracy and game plan of the colonial English to give a final slap in the face of the Indians before Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National Army unceremoniously threw and drove them out of the sprawling Sub-continent of India in its entirety!

The purview and ambit of the State of Pakistan

A prominent Pakistani filmmaker, Adeel Afzal, has on a YouTube channel Mosiki bemoaned the fact that India and Pakistan are engaged in an arms race at the cost of the economic conditions of the ordinary people of both the Countries. While the views have been expressed in good faith and with good intentions, Pakistan cannot compare, compete and equate itself with India and try to compete with India in every way possible. For one, at the end of the day after everything is said and done, Pakistan, at best is just a temporary local regional power and entity, whilst India is a global power on par with Russia, United States of America and China and will play a dominant part in the world geopolitics and geo-strategy. Pakistan is no longer a factor in India's development of technology vis-à-vis weapons for offence and defense. Even India's Maurya Empire under Devanampriya Ashoka, the Great, the proponent of peace maintained a huge standing army to protect our sovereignty and territorial integrity. Some Pakistanis think of every research in India pertaining to development of indigenous weapons of offence and defense are meant for use against Pakistan and view everything India does through the prism of threat to Pakistan. India's Intercontinental Range ballistic missile, Agni with a range of 12,000 km for example is meant to traverse Tibet and enter China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Manchuria, Europe or North America! Pakistan is not at all a factor! Pakistan was created by the English as a part of their geostrategic game plan to subvert India's progress to become a global power. It is an ad hoc temporary "fake" entity. Pakistan is a spoil sport and meant to stand in the way of India's progress. It has by design and default no other purpose or role envisaged to play. Pakistanis are pawns and are inadvertently playing into the game plan of these imperialistic powers. Eventually there is going to be a renaissance in Pakistan and the people of Pakistan  are going to recognise their Indian ancestry and their Indo- Aryan Indic heritage and ethos.  Pakistan is a sleeping giant which when aroused from slumber will eventually take over the reins of a re-unified India or South Asia! It is something inevitable and just waiting to happen!  We have to prevent the Balkanisation of Pakistan and the creation of any new bogus and spurious new so-called sovereign states particularly in the western province of Baluchistan in Pakistan, particularly after East Pakistan. Already, there is a covert game-plan by powers hostile and inimical to India and her eventual rise to become a super power at a time when India is spiraling towards re-unification, to create a spurious and bogus so-called sovereign state of Baluchistan which shall not be permitted, not withstanding all the endeavour of persons with ulterior motives and diabolical vested interests of the likes of Mr. Tarek Fatah whose pet theme is the so-called independence for the western province of Baluchistan is per se in collusion with powers which are inimical to India becoming a reunified powerful nation. Inevitably, in the long run there will be a revolution in Pakistan and the proud people of Pakistan would rise up and denounce and repudiate the two nation theory and call for the re-unification of India. It is not about Pakistan! Pakistan is a spoilsport created and designed  as a game plan to come in the way of India when it comes to the legitimate rights of India in world affairs. Look how Pakistan is standing in the way of India's absolute and unconditional right to be a part of the permanent 5 of the United Nations Organisation with full power of Veto! Imagine a re-unified India which has a stupendous population professing Islam, an India which is a permanent member of the Permanent Four of The Security Council of the United Nations Organisation with full Power of Veto, an India which has no Kashmir dispute since the whole of the sub-continent of India or South Asia is politically re-united as one country, the way it ought to have been all along. As I understand, Pakistan was solely  created in 1947 as a part of an international conspiracy to deny India her right, role and privilege as a world superpower and a country the Islamic nations could look up for support in the world International affairs! Insofar as the  missiles which India has herself indigenously designed and developed, it pertains to our geostrategic security threat from distant far away China in East Asia which has militarily Occupied our historical neighbouring countries, inter alia Tibet and East Turkistan, and the Chinese are in occupation of the area adjacent and adjoining the Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Kashmir including India's beloved Aksai Chin 36°27'44"N 78°45'24"E in Ladakh and the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir and Chinese are claiming vast areas of India including the Assam Himalaya. Pakistan has also  illegally given away vast inalienable parts of India in the area of Gilgit, Kanjut and Baltistan in the north western state of Jammu and Kashmir to the sly opportunistic Chinese in 1962 for their purported support. We already suffered in 1962 and India needs to be ready for any misadventure by the Chinese! In any case India's weapons presently are far inferior to Chinese military prowess and India desperately needs to develop her capabilities and be on par with the Chinese to enable India to drive away and throw the Chinese out of Tibet, the next time they try to engage in any misadventure. Pakistan is just a local regional power of no consequence  unlike India which will rise to become an international world power and Pakistan should not and cannot compare itself with India's own security concerns and global aspirations! Pakistan should understand its own inconsequential role and limitations as a temporary ad hoc small local regional entity and cannot aspire to compare its security capabilities with India's own! And ah, the speaker has forgotten to say that the Chinese are wasting their limited resources which can be better utilised for the betterment of their populations! It all has to do with the fact that at the end of the day, Pakistan is a spurious creation. Notwithstanding the best intentions of Jinnah, when he created a state for the first time in the world on the basis of the religious beliefs of Indians, it sent the ball rolling. It was pre-ordained! One thing leads to another. It happens with clockwork precision and cannot be averted or prevented. That is how all the minorities including the Hindus, Bengalis, Baluch, Ahmadi Muslims, Kachchhi, Hazaras came to be discriminated. The chain reaction or domino effect is inevitable and the end result will play itself out eventually to its logical conclusion, not withstanding the sane voices of the minority intellectuals and academics! There is only one way, only one way to stop the domino effect and that is to nip it at the source! So there!

There is nothing exceptional about Kashmir!

There is nothing exceptional about Kashmir. There were princely states in the length and breadth of India from Makran or Kharan in the western province of Baluchistan in western India to Manipur in eastern India or from Gilgit and Kanjut in Kashmir in northern India to Thiruvithamkoor in southern India. The option of independence was not available to any of the princely states. What is exceptional about Kashmir alone? The so-called Kashmir issue is a freak and artificial one which is the result of the arbitrary and artificial partition of India and the callousness of Mr Jawaharlal Nehru and his wilful inaction regarding the enforcement of the accession of the princely state of Kashmir to the Union of India and rather lodging a foolish complaint in the United Nations Organisation without the prior eviction of the invaders or raiders from Pakistan. Nor did Kashmir become a  condominium! Mr.Jawaharlal Nehru should have either permitted Pakistan to integrate the whole of predominantly Muslim Kashmir in its entirety into Pakistan, or he should have enforced the perfectly legal and valid legal accession of the whole of the princely state of Kashmir which comprises inter alia Gilgit, Kanjut, Baltistan, Ladakh, Mirpur, Chilas, the valley of Kashmir and Jammu in its entirety to the Union of India. But, Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru being Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru did neither! Even if the either had been done, then again there is a problem. It verily needed a vast strong united India with all the full strength which she could command to protect the external northern frontier of a geo-strategic province like Kashmir with the Trans- Kuen Lun Range country

of East Turkistan annexed by the Chinese. Neither the Pakistanis nor the Indians of the post 1947 partition moth-eaten India could do it on their own simply because only a big strong united country could do it!  It was to circumvent this handicap or impediment that President Field Marshal Ayub Khan  suggested a military alliance in the nature of a Common Joint defence for both India and Pakistan in the year 1959. The partition  of India itself was intrinsically and inherently flawed and morally wrong as the Sub-continent of India is a single organic living entity which cannot be amputated or divided or partitioned into two distinct beings or entities! Thus the so-called Kashmir issue was created, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that intrinsically or inherently Kashmir is a part of India just like any other part of India. Nothing more, nothing less! By India, I mean the historical nation of India prior to 1947 of which Kashmir or Baluchistan are an organic part, and not the moth-eaten present artificial borders like the Durand or Radcliffe Lines after the 1947 partition. The reason for the so-called Kashmir issue is thus per se extraneous and has nothing whatsoever to do with intrinsic status of the province of Kashmir itself. Article 370 of the Constitution of India is no artificial gum or glue which will indefinitely and permanently bond two mutually distinct & incompatible items. It was never ever required. Either Kashmir is intrinsically & inherently a part of India which Kashmir per se is and Kashmir will remain an inalienable and sacred part of India without the requirement of an artificial glue or an adhesive or conversely, if a territory is per se incompatible and not intrinsically and inherently a part of India, no artificial glue or adhesive in the nature of Article 370 of the Constitution of India can retain the territory  with the rest of India and the area would simply be a possession or colony rather than an organic part of India which Kashmir per se inherently and intrinsically is! Ultimately, the issue is whether the right to the nationhood of India can be permitted to be challenged and India be subjected to Balkanisation by whosoever or the nationhood of India be vindicated and whether the idea of India has to be preserved and protected for posterity!

India is destined to remain friend-less and alone

 The United States Deputy National Security Advisor, Daleep Singh is absolutely right that come-what-may,

the Russians would only support the Chinese in their territorial claims in India including the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir extending from Chhogori K2 to the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir, or Aksai Chin 36°40'36"N 78°21'33"E in Ladakh. The issue is

whether the United States is going to unconditionally and absolutely  support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of India vis-à-vis India's beloved and sacred inalienable Aksai Chin 36°40'36"N 78°21'33"E in Ladakh and whether their official  and government maps would depict Aksai Chin in Ladakh as per se an integral and inalienable part of India and not a so-called disputed territory, in exchange for India's friendship and support! The answer is a big resounding no! The United States regime would also support the Chinese in their territorial claims inside India in particular Aksai Chin in Ladakh, not because Aksai Chin is allegedly a so-called disputed territory, but because of their ulterior vested interests and diabolical game-plan.  Aksai Chin is per se a part of Ladakh and status of  Aksai Chin as integral part of India is non-compromisable. The fact is that India has no friends and India is all alone and destined to be alone and friendless, and has to be strong and powerful, for her defence or offence, to on her own drive away and throw the Chinese out of India's beloved and sacred inalienable Aksai Chin  36°40'36"N 78°21'33"E in Ladakh  and the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir in the inevitable and impending war with the Rogue Chinese regime, and also to defend herself from threats to her

sovereignty and territorial integrity from the Russians and Americans vis-à-vis the Chagos Archipelago in Lakshadvipa 6°40'07"S 71°19'48"E  in southeastern India. But the fact of the matter is that whichever government is in power in India, be it the Congress Government or the BJP government, the government of India is meek, submissive, subservient and servile and the

people of India rather than becoming modern, secular, irreligious and progressive nationalists are with the tacit support of the present dispensation gradually  undergoing a metamorphosis and predominantly fast being converted to become perverse narrow-minded communal and fascists nurturing a  visceral Islamophobia which imperils and threatens the predominantly peaceful Indian Muslims with genocide and annihilation!

Two ab initio illegal unilateral and arbitrary actions in 1954 in India and the Russian Federation respectively which resulted in the per se illegal diminution of the territorial extent of India and the Russian Federation, and how the two states responded to the illegality in the long run

 

In the year 1954 there were two momentous  arbitrary and unilateral  decisions  taken which are per se ab initio illegal and null and void and non est in law which resulted in the per se illegal diminution of the territorial extent of the Republic of India,  as well as  the  Russian Federation. 

On April 26, 1954 There was a decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet transferring the Crimea Oblast from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.

According to a 2009 article on Russian website “Pravda”, the Presidium of the Supreme Council gathered for a session on 19 February 1954 when only 13 of 27 members were present. There was no quorum, but the decision was adopted unanimously. 

The transfer merited only a paragraph in Pravda, the official Soviet newspaper, on Feb. 27, 1954. The story was one long sentence and dense with detail. Here is what it said:

"Decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme

Soviet transferring Crimea Province from the Russian Republic to the Ukraine Republic, taking into account the integral character of the economy, the territorial proximity and the close economic ties between Crimea Province and the Ukraine Republic, and approving the joint presentation of the Presidium of the Russian Republic Supreme Soviet and the Presidium of the Ukraine Republic Supreme Soviet on the transfer of Crimea Province from the Russian Republic to the Ukraine Republic."

And with that, a region that had been purportedly "part of Russia for centuries" was "gifted" to Ukraine. "Gifted" because Khrushchev's transfer was ostensibly to mark the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's merger with the Russian empire. And he probably didn't think the Soviet Union would disintegrate less than 40 years later.

But, asks Lewis Siegelbaum, a historian at Michigan State University, "what motivated such generosity?" Writing on the website Seventeen Moments In Soviet History, he says:

"After all, Crimea, the rugged peninsula jutting into the Black Sea, had not become territorially contiguous with Ukraine all of a sudden."

Siegelbaum argues that Crimea's cultural links with Russia were far stronger, and, at the time, there were slightly more than three Russians in Crimea for each Ukrainian. (Stalin had expelled the entire local Tatar population a decade earlier.)

Khrushchev informed his comrades of the decision to deliver Crimea to Ukraine incidentally, on the way to lunch. “Yes, comrades, there is an opinion to deliver Crimea to Ukraine,” he said casually. No one dared to express any protests, because a word of the first face of the Communist Party was law.

The agenda of the session of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which took place January 25, 1954, contained a question about the delivery of the Crimean region to the structure of the Ukrainian SSR. The discussion of the question took only 15 minutes. The participants of the meeting approved the decree, and the region was given away to Ukraine for free in a platter and for a song!

Not a single protest was made; no one had any doubts about the decision. No one wondered how the population (presumably the predominant Russian-speaking population, given the en masde expulsion and deportation of the indigenous  obviously acculturated Crimean Tatars) of Crimea would treat the decision. It turned out that such important issues as the territorial movement of regions could be solved without any difficulties at all.

The question ought to have been submitted to the open discussion of the Supreme Council of the Russian SSR. Moreover, a referendum should have been conducted to find out the opinion of the residents of the two republics. Nothing of that happened. The Presidium of the Supreme Council gathered for a session on February 19, 1954 - only 13 of 27 members were present. There was no quorum, but the decision was adopted unanimously. The Supreme Council of Russia ruled in 1992 that the Crimean region had been delivered to Ukraine illegitimately.

The earlier published documents and materials that have emerged more recently confirm that the transfer of Crimea from the Russian SFSR to the Ukrainian SSR was carried out in accordance with the 1936 Soviet constitution, which in Article 18 stipulated that "the territory of a Union Republic may not be altered without its consent." The proceedings of the USSR Supreme Soviet Presidium meeting indicate that both the Russian SFSR and the Ukrainian SSR had given their consent via their republic parliaments. 

On 27 June 2015, after the so-called "annexation" of Crimea by the Russian Federation, the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation accepted the request of the leader of A Just Russia party, Sergey Mironov, to evaluate the legitimacy of 1954 transfer of Crimea and stated that the transfer violated both the Constitution of the Russian SFSR and the Constitution of the Soviet Union. The text of the document signed by Russian Deputy Prosecutor General Sabir Kekhlerov stated: "Neither the Constitution of the RSFSR or the USSR Constitution provide powers of the Presidium Supreme Soviet of the USSR for the consideration of the changes in the constitutional legal status of the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, members of the union republics. In view of the above, the decision adopted in 1954 by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviets of the RSFSR and the Soviet on the transfer of the Crimean region of the RSFSR to the USSR, did not correspond to the Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the RSFSR and the Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the USSR." 

In January 1992, the Supreme Soviet of Russia questioned the constitutionality of the transfer, accusing Nikita Khrushchev of treason against the Russian people and said that the transfer was illegitimate. Alexander Rutskoy, the former Vice President of Russia, said that this was a “harebrained scheme” for which Khrushchev was famous saying that those who signed the document must have been suffering from sunstroke or hangovers.

Thus when it comes to Russia, there has been a voracious endeavour by Russian Nationalist academicians and intellectuals  to quite rightly denounce and repudiate the illegal transfer of Crimea in 1954 from the Russian Federation to Ukraine and undo and set-aside  the whole exercise  and procedure by vitiating it legally as non est in law  and also politically. That is what is to be expected of a proud and self-respecting nation whose conduct is not one of subservience and being  servile and meek.

Now coming to India,  again in the very same

year, 1954 one notorious Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, in collusion with the Chinese  published out of the blue,  an ab initio illegal, bogus and spurious, insulting fraudulent map which is per se ultra vires the sacrosanct Constitution of India and non est in law which ceased  to depict vast areas of the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir extending from the Shingshal Valley and Chhogori Peak K2 8611 metres in central Kashmir to Dafdar, Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir and The Raskam Tract, and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, and Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in northern Kashmir as part of India and consequently resulted in the illegal cartographical cession of the aforesaid integral parts of India resulting in the illegal diminution of the territorial extent of India as a gift to the Chinese. There has been no chest beating. No hoarse cry! Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru accomplished the work he set out to do with precision for a song, just like that! 

Two maps, viz. The official maps attached to the

White Papers published in July 1948 and February 1950 by the Government of India's Ministry of States, headed, incidentally, by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, under the authority of India's Surveyor General G.F.Heaney pertaining to the period of the commencement of the sacrosanct Constitution of India give them the legal status to determine the extent of the State of Kashmir as stipulated in Entry 15 in the First Schedule of the Constitution on India. The said official maps presented with the White Papers prove that the northern border of Kashmir with East Turkistan at the time of the accession of the state to the Union of India was on the Kuen Lun Range, the natural and historic border of Kashmir with neighbouring Trans-Kuen Lun State of East Turkistan.

Pertinently, it is imperative to note that areas shown in colour including the Kashmiri Town of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir in the aforesaid maps are illegally not depicted as part of Kashmir by the present office of the Surveyor General of India presently in consonance with the bogus and spurious map published  by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru in collusion with the Chinese. 

The Government of Kashmir had in exercise of its territorial sovereignty built a fort in the historical northern Kashmiri town of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir to command the Kuen Lun  range  and to regulate and control these Kirghiz vagabond and criminal thugs. 

In June 1954, Zhou Enlai, Prime Minister of China was in India, and in the October of the same year Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru went to China. In between, Nehru issued a memorandum which stated inter alia that the frontier should be considered a firm and definite one, which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should be spread along this entire frontier. As was seen later, this lie  perpetrated on the Indian Nation  which was the pretext for this collusive bogus and false map of 1954 was tested and proved to be a lie in 1959. The  Alleged purpose of the 1954 Nehru Line was that the  "Frontier should be considered a firm and definite one, which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should  be spread along this entire frontier". The spurious and bogus reason for the publication of this illegal map can  be inferred from what happened in 1959! 

In 1959, The Director of the Intelligence

Bureau , B.N. Mullik recommended the setting of new posts in Kashmir, at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol and Palong Karpo  verily in consonance with the alleged rationale behind the per se illegal and null and void map of  1954 depicting the Nehru Line  is discussed in January 1959 at a meeting in the External Affairs Ministry in the presence of Gen. Thimayya, Chief of the Army staff and the Foreign Secretary, Mr. Subimal Dutt, who was a part of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru's coterie.  Both the Army Chief and the Foreign Secretary  opposed the proposal to open border posts at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol  because according to them, the opening of the said posts would ‘provoke’ the Chinese, and create tension and “this part of the territory was useless to India", thus  debunking for ever the fraudulent reason for publishing the ab initio illegal  bogus and spurious map in 1954. Unlike much of the Russian Empire which was created by conquest, acquisition and deportation of the aboriginal indigenous population, particularly in annexed Crimea and the annihilation of Circassia, the whole of Aksai Chin including the Ngari Khor-sum extending to the ridges separating the plateau of Tibet from the Highlands of Kashmir on which are the Aling Kangri and the Mawang Kangri peaks, in Ladakh was historically per se part of Ladakh pure and simple even before the marauding Tibetans from the east reached the frontiers of Maryul in Kashmir and there was nothing whatsoever to discuss with the Chinese about this. Aksai Chin was per se not a disputed territory. It is non-negotiable! There is nothing whatsoever to discuss with the Chinese about Aksai Chin. It is per se a part of India pure and simple. 

If there had been well-informed and proud nationalist Indians, there would have been an outrage and a revolution and India would have denounced and repudiated Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru for treason and condemned him for his criminal actions against India and India would have undone the illegality and restored India's historical International Boundary with the sovereign state of East Turkistan on the Kuen Lun Range which is inevitably waiting to happen. 

On 04.04.2011, one Writ Petition (Civil) No. 127 of 2011, P.V.Ravi Chandran Vs. The Union of India and Others preferred as a public interest litigation by an Advocate hailing from Ponani, Bharata Pužha, Malappuram, Kerala practicing in the Honourable High Court of Madras, P.V.Ravi Chandran came up for hearing in the Honourable Supreme Court of India. It was a sui generis case wherein in addition to the Union of India, the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Survey of India were arrayed as parties, and was profound in its significance and ramifications and had enough merits and was a magnum opus that it would have been not just admitted during admission but also even allowed in limine as prayed for had it been any other country. It was an opportunity to save India like never before and just in time and was waiting to happen and the Apex Court ought to have seized the opportunity. Instead, the Apex Court dismissed it in a single line order, not on merits and hence there is no res judicata, and without hearing the party- in - person and with false observation that the Petitioner had been heard, which was in the first place a lie.

Writ Petition  (Civil) No. 127 of 2011, P.V.Ravi Chandran Vs. The Union of India and Others, dated 04.04.2011 was dismissed with an oral observation that  the Petitioner therein could give a complaint or representation which in fact  had already been  meticulously done and exhausted. It was per se a fraudulent, dishonest, deceitful and treacherous and a corrupt judgement based on altogether extraneous considerations which were not germane to the merits of the case, and the oral observations did not even feature in the printed  copy of the judgement received by the Petitioner therein and was obiter dictum. The issue is that the upper Indian Judiciary right from the Honourable Supreme Court of India is all powerful and not accountable and some of the Honourable Judges can do as they please in accordance with their perverse whims and fancies and are bereft of morals, integrity or convictions, and where does a small person like the Petitioner therein fit in the scheme of things?

India is per se a subservient and servile state  whose population has been effectively emasculated and rendered effeminate in a process and procedure set in motion, and laid in place established and consolidated by the notorious Jawaharlal Nehru regime in India since १९४७! The three wings of the State, are irredeemably corrupt and cannot be redeemed in the present scenario. 

But we Indians are in the first place ignorant and oblivious about map reading and understanding our country's borders depicted in maps. Secondly, we do not feel angry, outraged, indignant, upset, or repulsive when the borders of India are depicted wrongly and incorrectly by Pro-Chinese agencies like Wikipedia or even the so-called Indian Press media, and we do not hold massive rallies and demonstrations  and demand that the publishers be punished and the company or publisher like the notorious Hindu, India's Anti-national Newspaper, be stormed, confiscated and  shut down. This is because we were manipulated to be a meek, submissive, subservient, effeminate and emasculated people by policies which were put in place by the notorious Jawaharlal Nehru! To sum up, we  are programmed and designed over a period of time to be utterly shameless! We lost that martial spirit of Ashfaqullah Khan or Bhagat Singh after  the scheming, conniving  regime of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru who was verily an wolf in sheep's clothing who ran with the hare & hunted with the hounds, in collusion with the Chinese took over & converted India into a nation full of effeminate and emasculated Indians!