Sunday, October 18, 2026

The significance, magnitude, implication and consequence of the first official map of Pakistan published by the Survey of Pakistan and the Government of Pakistan

 In 1950, for the very first time,  the Government of Pakistan published a map of Pakistan titled  The Map of "Pakistan and Surrounding Countries" produced by the newly created


State of Pakistan in around 1950 under the direction of Colonel Claude Arthur Key Innes-Wilson, Surveyor-General of Pakistan pertaining to the period of the Commencement of the sacrosanct Constitution of India.


The implication of the map pertaining to the period of the commencement of the Constitution of India is profound and far-reaching and verily depicts the northern International Boundary of India with East Turkistan as a legend.  The “ Frontier Undefined” in this Survey of Pakistan map of 1950 pertaining to the period of the commencement of the Sacrosanct Constitution of India is predominantly, though not precisely, on the Kuen Lun


Range boundary depicting the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir, Dafdar the northernmost part of the Republic of India and the Kukalang, Yangi, and Hindu-tash, Yangi Passes and the Karanghu Tagh & Yarung Kash near the border outpost of Bringja as part of India.


This map was arbitrarily, unilaterally and ab initio illegally in accordance with his perverse whims and fancies  altered by Jawaharlal Nehru in collusion with China in 1954 in a colourable exercise of power & a fraud perpetrated  on the Constitution of India and the people of India  whereby vast areas hitherto depicted as an integral & inalienable part of Kashmir ceased to be depicted as part of Kashmir.


If the Govt. of India did not in limine have the balls to depict Taghdumbash Pamir & Mariom Pamir, Dafdar, & the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la & Hindu-tash Passes in Kashmir as part of India, at least the Survey of Pakistan and the Government of Pakistan


then had. It is unfortunate that Pakistan did not take a consistent stance till today denouncing, repudiating the fraudulent, bogus and  spurious line published by Jawaharlal Nehru in 1954 out of the blue and reiterate that the International boundary of Kashmir was on the watershed of the Kuen Lun Range wherein are the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la, Hindutash and Yangi Passes in Kashmir .


If only the Government of Pakistan had denounced & repudiated the illegal Nehru Line of 1954 & upheld the northern Boundary of Kashmir to the north of Dafdar & at Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la & Hindutash Passes in Kashmir, the State of Pakistan would have established a high moral ground that it was Pakistan and not the motheaten State of India which  had the inclination, commitment and integrity to secure and safeguard the territorial integrity of Kashmir.


The map published by the Survey of Pakistan Government of Pakistan is a snub and slap in the face of Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India and  proves how enormous his unilateral, arbitrary fraudulent and unlawful act of treason which is ab initio illegal, null and  void and  non est in law and  ultra vires the sacrosanct Constitution of India, is.

After the Partition, as suggested by this map, the relations between India and Pakistan ought to have been cordial and friendly with both the countries taking a common stance  and acted in unison regarding upholding and securing the territorial integrity of India and Pakistan respectively. It was the Government of Pakistan which  requested and laid a proposal for the joint defense of the Indian Sub-continent made in the year 1959. ‘The crux of the whole matter was that the armies of both the countries were continuing to face each other when they could have been released to defend their respective territories’….’the need to have a joint defence originates from the basic fact that India and Pakistan lived in the same region which had to be defended after an understanding between the people of the two countries’…if we ‘disengage our armed forces from facing inwards as they do today, and face them outward , I feel we shall have a good chance of preventing a recurrence of the history of the past, which was that whenever this sub-continent was divided –and often it was divided –some one or the other invited an outsider to step in’. But of course, Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru would not have any thing of that sort. Would not the pact for  A joint defence agreement with Pakistan not provoke and antogonise China?

Pakistan's first military ruler, field marshal Ayub Khan who seized power in a coup in 1958, was wary of expansionism by Communist China. One of the measures he suggested to contain this would sound improbable today: A joint defence agreement with India.  From 1953, Chinese troops carried out localised intrusions into Hunza. In 1959, Ayub Khan declared, "any Chinese intrusion into Pakistan territory would be repelled by Pakistan with all the force at her command”. After Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru spurned the proposal for A joint defence agreement with Pakistan, Pakistan  which like India was created as a non-viable state which could not suo moto defend the external boundaries was forced to capitulate and  consider or regard India as the principal enemy or adversary and surrender vast territories to China in exchange of arms and ammunition and socalled friendship  with China.


The hesitation of  the Government of India in limine to depict the International border of India with East Turkistan on the Kuen Lun Range in Kashmir on the  Taghdumbash Pamir, & the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la & Hindu-tash Passes was a habitual and chronic conduct of subservience and  servitude and  emphasised the lack of commitment and inclination  to protect the territorial integrity of Kashmir.  This pernicious conduct has subsisted till date with Mr Ajit Doval's obnoxious statement  that sovereignty extends only "Up to the last point where our border soldier is able to go and put his foot down". His statement that sovereignty extends only "Up to the last point where our border soldier is able to go and put his foot down" is per se false mischievous collusive anti-national act for which the Government of India should have taken punitive action against Mr. Ajit Doval. Such a person like Ajit Doval is unfit and incompetent for holding the post of National Security Advisor (NSA). He is per se imperiling the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India and he should be summarily be removed and terminated by the  Government of India.