Arundhati Roy's duplicity and her apparent collusion with hostile powers inimical to India's sovereignty and territorial integrity

In a writeup published by Arundhati Roy, titled “Modi's brutal treatment of Kashmir exposes his tactics – and their flaws”, written in a foreign Newspaper, the Guardian to cater to her foreign white audience and masters,  She states,” In India’s parliament, home minister Amit Shah went further. He said he was prepared to lay down his life to take over the territories of what India calls Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) and what Kashmiris call Azad Kashmir, as well as the frontier provinces of Gilgit-Baltistan. He also threw in Aksai Chin, once part of the erstwhile kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir, now a part of China. He was wading into dangerous territory, literally as well as figuratively” .

So according to Arundhati Roy, the nationalistic and  patriotic duty of liberating 

the Chinese and Pakistani occupied parts of Kashmir whose accession to the Union of India was legal and  was in its entirety and the welcome purported  statement of the Home Minister that Aksai Chin is a sacred part of the territory of the composite state of Jammu and Kashmir and that this aspect about the territorial extent of Jammu and Kashmir whose accession to the Union of India was in its entirety has been enunciated in both the sacrosanct  Constitution of India as well as the then Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir  and that he would give his life for Pakistan Occupied Kashmir  is improper.  She alleges and claims that Aksai Chin “once part of the erstwhile kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir”, is  “now a part of China”. Thus she per se  recognizes Aksai Chin as allegedly a part of “China” and not a part of Ladakh, Kashmir, India! She does not unequivocally say that the whole of Aksai Chin 36°25'34"N 78°46'39"E in Ladakh, Kashmir in its entirety is an integral, sacred and inalienable part of India. 

This is not a write-up purportedly  about the rampant human rights violation in the length and breadth of India. It is geo-strategical  writing by a person with geo-strategic interests availing classified information, who is in collusion with enemies of India and she is supporting these Countries in their territorial claims in India using the façade of violation of human rights in India about which she does not have an iota of interest . It has nothing whatsoever to  do with Human Rights and the Government of India and  all Indians should see through her deceitful and treacherous collusive geo-strategic vested interests to undermine the security and the sacred territorial integrity of India.

According to Arundhati Roy, it is provocation if  the Indian meteorological department begins to include Gilgit-Baltistan in its National Indian weather reports. She is asking India  as the agent of the Chinese Rogue State to be subservient and servile to the Chinese Rogue State and  beware of  the Rogue Chinese regime  when it urged India to “be cautious in its words and deeds on the border issue”.

She blames the Honourable  Supreme Court of India and commits contempt of the Honourable Supreme Court of India  by stating that the Honourable  Supreme Court of India  “for a whole year allowed the internet siege to continue and ignored the 600 habeas corpus petitions by distraught people seeking the whereabouts of their family members”.

 

She expects India to be servile and subservient to the Rogue Chinese Regime in unlawful military occupation of our sovereign neighbouring  Countries, Tibet and East Turkistan. She says, “We have a dragon on our doorstep and it isn’t happy”.  She claims that the Galwan Valley is on the “Ladakh Border” whereas the Galwan Valley is on the Ceasefire Line and in the interior of Kashmir and not on the International Border of India with East Turkistan adjoining the Sanju-La and the Hindu-tash Passes in Ladakh.  According to her, “On 17 June 2020, we awoke to the horrifying news that 20 Indian soldiers including a colonel had been brutally killed by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in the icy reaches of the remote Galwan Valley on the Ladakh border”. She keeps mum about the countless Chinese soldiers who had been butchered by the  Indian Armed Forces! She remains silent burying her head under the sand and maintains a Sphinx like deafening silence. Being So, according to Arundhati Roy, the Galwan Valley is on the International Border. She is blatantly in collusion with the Rogue Chinese State. Let there be not an iota of doubt about that.  There is much more to it than meets the eye. This write-up of her's is not at all about human rights violation but a write-up upholding the Chinese territorial claims inside India, and Arundhati Roy has to be held accountable. She is as per the diabolical gameplan, trying scaremonger Indians and endeavouring to demean, intimidate, and undermine India's indomitable resolve to drive away and throw the Chinese out of India's beloved inalienable  Aksai Chin in Ladakh. If she is interrogated, and subjected to polygraph, narco-analysis and brain-mapping, the cat would be out of the bag. She has to apologise and confess and divulge the information about the enemies of India with whom she is liaising and  verily in collusion with the Chinese and other adversaries in their endeavor to balkanize India and undermine the geo-strategic interests of India and her sacred territorial integrity at a time when India is spiraling towards the re-unification of India, and beg the pardon of the proud nation of India or be subjected to criminal prosecution  in accordance with law for treason and sedition in collusion with the Chinese occupying India's neighbouring countries, Tibet and East Turkistan.

 

Arundhati Roy does not admit that the areas into  which the Chinese encroached  is per se an integral  and inalienable sacred  part of India and refers to the around more than hundreds of square kilometres of land which the Chinese have encroached as  “what India considers to be its territory”.  She expects India to be docile, servile and subservient to the Chinese and suggests that the encroachment was not a naked aggression  by China but was a result of the Home Minister of India purportedly stating that Aksai Chin shall be liberated from Chinese Occupation.  She says, “ Was it just naked aggression as portrayed by the Indian media? Or have the Chinese moved to protect what they see as their vital interests – a road

through the high mountains of Aksai Chin and a trade route through Pakistan Occupied/Azad Kashmir? Both are under threat, if the belligerent statements made by India’s home minister were to be taken seriously, and how can they not be? Arundhati Roy is actually vindicating and validating the encroachments of the Rogue Chinese Regime further into western Ladakh in the Galwan and the Pangong Tsu in western Ladakh.  

The Home Minister of India, Mr. Amit Shah  rightly  stated in the Parliament of India that, "Kashmir is an integral part of India, there is no doubt about it. When I say Jammu and Kashmir, I include Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and Aksai Chin, both are included in the territorial boundaries of Jammu and Kashmir". That was a welcome statement. It was a breath of fresh air which ought to have been unanimously  welcomed by all political parties in India across the political spectrum. We did not see the suspected  Italian spy, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi clap or applaud our Home Minister of India when he unequivocally stated that he would sacrifice his life for PoK. She was in a well practiced and rehearsed  modus operandi looking behind to view her coterie playing out her whims and fancies as per the prior geostrategic arrangement put in practice.  

Arundhati Roy is obviously right when she says that, “But even without an official war, for India to keep a standing army on the Ladakh border, supplied and equipped for high-altitude warfare, for it to even remotely match China’s arsenal, India’s defence budget would probably have to double or triple in size. Even that won’t be enough”.  Why does Arundhati Roy not call out for the  summary and proportional Increase in the defence budget of India so that it is on par with the Chinese defence budget? Yes, India has to increase manifold her defence budget exponentially and more than  triple her defence budget and support the independence of Tibet and East Turkistan and recognize Tibet and East Turkistan as sovereign independent neighbouring countries and oust China and take the place of the Rogue State of China in the Security Council of the United Nations Organisation with full power of Veto and vitiate all proceedings of the United Nations Organisation prior to that as ab initio illegal and null and void.  But the pertinent issue is where does Arundhati Roy  who is

purportedly a petty puny cheap pulp fiction writer turned "human rights activist" get this highly classified geo-strategic information from? These are not words emanating from a purportedly human rights activist, she ostensibly claims to be but is pregnant with classified geo-strategical information. Why should this information be at all  a part of a write-up which is allegedly about human rights violations in Kashmir?  The truth is that her predominantly gibberish purported write-up about alleged human rights violations in Kashmir is simply a façade  for her writing a geo-strategic geopolitical and militaristic  article blatantly supporting  and in collusion with the Rogue Chinese Regime and supporting their bogus, fictitious  and spurious territorial

claims inside India to the detriment of India. The Government of India should see through her deceitful  and treacherous conduct and prosecute her in accordance with law, not because she purportedly wrote an article condemning human rights violations in Kashmir  but because this article is not at all about human rights violations in Kashmir but a collusive geo-strategic article supporting Chinese strategic  interests and geo-strategic territorial claims inside India to the geo-strategic  detriment of India  and Indians have to wake up and see through the conduct of such parasitic agents of regimes hostile to the unity and territorial integrity of India makinguse of the prevalence of rule of law and Constitutional law in India to undermine India’s geo-strategic interests.  

Arundhati Roy ridicules the unanimous Judgment of the Honlurable Supreme Court of India on the Ayodhya  temple by stating that the construction of a Sri Rama temple, “as well as the blessings of India’s supreme court”.

Arundhati Roy finally culminates by  quoting  the Chinese and warning Indians to be servile and subservient to the Rogue Chinese Regime in illegal military occupation of India’s traditional and historical sovereign neighbours, Tibet and the trans Kuen-Lun State of East Turkistan. She says, “The

world oroder is changing. You can’t bully people and act like the top dog in the neighbourhood when you’re not top dog. That’s not a Chinese saying. It’s just common sense”. Arundhati Roy is just as per her diabolical conspiracy and game plan, trying to demoralise or Indian Army and the proud Indian nation. 

The message on the wall is loud and clear, India should not be a proud and sovereign  nation and should know where their place is, that of perpetual subservience and servility to the Rogue Chinese Regime of the distant and faraway  Rogue State of China in East Asia in illegal military Occupation of Tibet and East Turkistan and claiming to be a country which allegedly has an international Boundary with India!

The veritable modus operandi of Arundhati Roy is to as per her game plan, earn fame and glory by

initially supporting a just movement like the Narmada movement or Athirapally in the Vazhachal forest and after she has done just that, misuse her ill-earned fame and glory obviously at the behest of countries hostile to India in Europe and North America and East Asia which countries India should be wary of, and start espousing separatist movements in India. India should interrogate her and get the cat out of the bag by making her divulge the names of the hostile countries at whose behest she is indulging in such illegal and anti-national delinquencies! This is per se a form of neo-colonialism pure and simple! Arundhati Roy may have won the so-called Booker Prize as a part of the game plan for obvious quid pro quo reasons but at the end of the day, she is just a giggling and gossiping silly girl. But when she crosses the line and makes all fantastic sensational collusive statements which are per se false, derogatory, preposterous, absurd, and legally unsustainable and meant solely for earning the goodwill and praise of her predominantly white extra-national patrons in the West and countries hostile to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of India to the detriment of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India, she has to be brought to justice, not for expressing her freedom of speech or making dissenting statements but for maliciously making untrue statements to sub-serve and cater to the needs of her white patrons abroad and in collusion with them. 

But however, Arundhati Roy is deeply concerned that "India will cease to exist if we accept National

Register of Citizens and the Citizenship Amendment Bill:, adding that “we are faced with the biggest challenge since Independence.” Such a shameless and spineless character who wants to balkanise India but nevertheless is deeply concerned that India will cease to exist! It would be wrong to assume that she is delusional or mentally retarded or is genetically afflicted with idiocy! She wants to have the cake and eat it also and she knows that she can with impunity, this being India! She is a crook!

Yes, "Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing”!

 

 

 

Demarcation of the International Boundary of India with the De Jure Government-in-Exile of the Republic of East Turkistan

It is imperative in the light of the despicable and opportunistic blatantly illegal and null and void so-called border agreement entered by the Rogue Chinese State  which illegally and militarily occupies the  sovereign states of the Republic of East Turkistan and Tibet for the Government of the Republic of India to convene a meeting of the authorized representatives of the De Jure Government in- Exile of the Sovereign State of East Turkistan and hold deliberations and demarcate the International Boundary of India with the Republic of East Turkistan, our historic neighbour. The Prime Minister of Occupied East Turkistan, Salih Hudayar has also reiterated that Aksai Chin 36°40'41"N 78°26'34"E in Ladakh and the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir are an integral and inalienable part India. India as a self-respecting and sovereign 

Nation which is not subservient and servile to any ought to have done it then and there on  2nd march 1963 itself when the Rogue Regime in China signed the treacherous and deceitful opportunistic illegal so-called border agreement with the Pakistanis pertaining to territory which is a part of India.

It is reprehensible that the conduct of the Republic of  India has been servile and one of subservience and the Government of India has so far not taken any action which would be deemed to anger the Rogue Chinese Regime in unlawful military occupation of Tibet and East Turkistan. The Government of India had initially issued visa to the East Turkistan leader -in -Exile Shri Dolkun Isa  but had in a shameful act of subservience and servility canceled the Visa originally issued to him and refused him permission of entry into the territory of India. 

The East Turkistan National Awakening Movement (ETNAM) has vide Twitter in response to a tweet responded in a private message on behalf of the De Jure Government of East Turkistan -in-Exile elucidated and issued clarification as follows:-

"We just want to clarify that Mr. Dolkun Isa is NOT affiliated with the East Turkistan Government in Exile or the East Turkistan National Awakening Movement. As far as our position on Eastern Ladakh (Aksai Chin), we adhere to the positions held by The State of East Turkistan/Kashgaria (1865-1884) and the former East Turkistan Republics (1933-1934 & 1944-1949) which is that they respect India's sovereignty & territorial integrity and doesn't claim Eastern Ladakh as part of East Turkistan's territory as per the 1865 Johnson Line. An independent East Turkistan wouldn't have any border problems or any other issues with our ancient neighbor India".

Besides The East Turkistan National Awakening Movement (ETNAM) has vide Twitter in response to a tweet by this author herein responded on behalf of the De Jure Government of East Turkistan -in-Exile as follows:-

"Dolkun Isa isn't affiliated with the @ETExileGov and @ETAwakening. The position of  the 

@ETAwakening &  @ETExileGov  on  Eastern Ladakh (Aksai Chin) is that it is a part of India since 1865 per the Johnson Line. We respect India's sovereignty & territorial integrity".

The Draft text of the proposed agreement to be inevitably signed is as follows:-

The Government of the Republic of India  and the  Government-In-Exile of  The Sovereign Republic of

Opening of the ETGE's 8th General Assembly
 in Washington, DC on November 10, 2019

East Turkistan presently under the illegal military occupation by the Rogue Regime in China; having agreed, with a view to ensure the  peace and tranquillity on their respective border after the inevitable impending independence of East Turkistan, to formally delimit and demarcate the boundary between  the Trans -Kuen Lun sovereign Republic  of Turkistan with India on the Kuen Lun Range  in a spirit of fairness, reasonableness, mutual understanding and mutual accommodation, and on the Internationally recognised principle of Watershed as the legitimate basis for the demarcation of the International Boundaries. Being convinced that this would not only give full expression to the desire of the peoples of East Turkistan  and India for the development of good neighbourly and friendly relations, but also help safeguard Asian, particularly Central Asian and South Asian and world peace.

Have resolved for this purpose to conclude the present agreement and have appointed as their respective plenipotentiaries the following.

For the Government of the Republic of India,  Minister of Foreign Affairs.

For the De Jure Government of the Republic of East Turkistan, Minister of External Affairs.

Who, having mutually examined their full powers and found them to be in good and due form have agreed upon the following:-

Article 1.  In view of the fact that the historical  boundary between the Trans Kuen Lun state of East Turkistan  and the contiguous areas in the adjoining  Highlands of Kashmir comprising the areas of former principalities of Ladakh or Maryul and Kanjut adjoining the Trans Kuen Lun State of East Turkistan on the Kuen Lun Range Border  has never been formally delimited, two parties agree to delimit it on the basis of the traditional customary boundary line including features and in a spirit of equality, mutual benefit and friendly cooperation.

Article 2.  In accordance with the principle expounded in Article 1 of the present agreement, the two parties have fixed as follows the alignment of the entire boundary line between The composite Cis- Kuen Lun State of Kashmir comprising the Highlands  of Kashmir from the edges of the Highlands of Kashmir on the Kuen Lun Range to the area of Kathua in Jammu which legally acceded to the Union of India  and the Trans-Kuen Lun State of East Turkistan. The Republic of East Turkistan endorses and acknowledges the fact that the province of Kashmir is geographically a highlands province and hence

has two types of mountain Ranges which comprise part of the province. One the Main or Internal Mountain Range which is insofar as Kashmir is concerned is the Karakoram Mountain Range and the second, the Mountain Range at the edge of the Highlands of Kashmir which is insofar as Kashmir is concerned is the Kuen Lun Range and the historical  Inter-national Boundary between India and East Turkistan has always historically  been on the Mountain Range on the Edge of the Highlands of Kashmir viz. The Kuen Lun Range thus similar to the manner that The International Boundary of India with Tibet east of the Mayum-La is not on the Nyenchen Thanglha Range which is the Internal or Main Mountain Range in the Plateau of Tibet which forms the watershed of the Brahma Putra river in India  vis-à-vis  the Mountain Range on the edge of the Plateau of Tibet viz. the Great Himalaya Range which east of Mayum-La Marnyak-La forms the Boundary of India with Tibet..  

1. Commencing from its north-western extremity in  the area of Dafdar in the Taghdumbash Pamir, the northernmost part of the Republic of India, the boundary line runs from the northwest of Dafdar on

the line of water parting of the Kuen Lun Range separating  the Tashkurghan River from  the Mariong River and continues on the point of water Parting on the Kuen Lun Range via Zangar, Chang, Sargon, Mamkol and  Yashrab Passes and then crosses the  Raskam River and continues on the line of the water parting separating the Raskam River system including  the tributaries of the Raskam River inside the highlands of Kashmir viz. inter alia  the Kukalang and Kulanaldi Rivers  of the Raskam River System inside Kashmir which flows in Kashmir and enters East Turkistan in the area of Sanglash from  inter alia  the Ishakbulak, Tizuaf, Pokhpu, Dona Ustang, Achik, Tiznaf, Kokyar or Kilian Rivers  which have its source on the Kuen Lun Range and flows north into the Takla Makan  desert in the Tarim Basin in East Turkistan

2 The International Boundary will continue on the line of the water parting of the Kuen Lun Range and

pass through the Mountain Passes on the Kuen Lun Range separating India from East Turkistan like inter alia the Kukalang Pass, the Chirag Saldi Pass, the Yangi Pass, the Kilian Pass and the Sanju-La  Pass. 

3 From the aforesaid point of the Sanju-La Pass, the Inter-national boundary line runs from the Sanju-La Pass and crosses the Kara Kash River at a point east of Ali Nazar in Ladakh  and runs on the Hindu-tash Ridge which is a spur of the Kuen Lun Range to the historic  Hindu-tash Davan Pass in Ladakh and thence continues eastward on the Kuen Lun Range on the line (point ) of the water parting separating the Qara Qash and the Yarung Kash  from the rivers flowing north from the Kuen Lun Range like inter alia the Sanju, Pusha, Kashka Oghil, Genju, Nura, Karasu and Pisha Rivers.  

5 Thence, the boundary line continues and culminates at Pulu where the Kuen Lun Range in Kashmir and the Altyn Tagh Range on the edge of the Plateau of Tibet converge. Running southwest to northeast, the Altyn Tagh converges with the Kunlun range in Kashmir which runs southeast to northwest forming a "V" shape which converges at Pulu. 

Article 3 . The two parties have agreed that:

i) The boundary follows the Kuen Lun Range, the  water-parting line  of the Kuen Lun Range dividing the rivers systems flowing into the Raskam, Kara Kash, and the Yurung Kash River Systems  inside Kashmir on one side  from the Rivers flowing north from the Kuen Lun Range to the Tarim Basin in East Turkistan . 

ii) Wherever the boundary passes through a Davan (Pass) the water-parting line thereof shall be the boundary line.

Article 4.  One,  the two parties have agreed to set up, as soon as possible, a joint boundary demarcation commission. Each side will appoint a Chairman, one or more members and a certain number of advisers and technical staff. The joint boundary demarcation commission is charged with the responsibility in accordance with the provisions of the present agreement, to hold concrete discussions on and carry out the following tasks jointly.

1) To conduct necessary surveys of the boundary area on the ground, as stated in Article 2 of the present agreement so as to set up boundary markers at places considered to be appropriate by the two parties and to delineate the boundary line of the jointly prepared accurate maps.

To draft a protocol setting forth in detail the alignment of the entire boundary line and the location of all the boundary markers and prepare and get printed detailed maps, to be attached to the protocol, with the boundary line and the location of the boundary markers shown on them.

2) The aforesaid protocol, upon being signed by representatives of the governments of the two countries, shall become an annex to the present agreement, and the detailed maps shall replace the maps attached to the present agreement.

3) Upon the conclusion of the above-mentioned protocol, the tasks of the joint boundary demarcation commission shall be deemed to have been terminated.

Article 5.  The two parties reiterate that any doubts concerning the boundary which may arise after the delimitation of the boundary line actually existing between the two countries shall be resolved peacefully and amicably by the two parties through friendly consultations.

Article 6.  The two parties have agreed that after the inevitable independence of the sovereign State of East Turkistan, the de Jure Government of the independent and sovereign State of East Turkistan and India, will reiterate and uphold the Preliminary agreement signed by the de Jure Government of the Sovereign Republic of  East Turkistan-in-Exile as stated in Article 2 and ratify and confirm and sign a formal boundary treaty to replace the present preliminary agreement signed by the de jure Government of East Turkistan in Exile. 

Article 7 . The present agreement shall come into force on the date of its signature.

Done in triplicate in Berlin , Washington and Nav Dehli on the second day of August 2021, in the Uighur, Hindi and English languages, all the versions being equally authentic.