Tuesday, May 11, 2021

The deceit and treachery of Jawaharlal Nehru behind the fraudulent publication of the spurious and bogus 1954 Line

 1.  In June 1954, Zhou Enlai, Prime Minister of China


was in India, and in the October of the same year Jawaharlal Nehru went to China. In between in collusion with the Chinese, Nehru issued a memorandum which stated inter alia that the frontier should be considered a firm and definite one , which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should be spread along this entire frontier. 
In 1954, Nehru publishes an ab initio illegal bogus and spurious, fraudulent map which ceases  to depict vast areas of the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir including Dafdar, Taghdumbash Pamir, Raskam, Kukalang Pass, and Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes as part


of
India and consequently results in the illegal cartographical cession of the aforesaid integral parts of India resulting in the illegal diminution of the territorial extent of India as a gift to the Chinese. 

2. Alleged purpose of the 1954 Nehru Line:- "Frontier should be considered a firm and definite one, which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should  be spread along this entire frontier"! 



3. In 1959, The Director of the Intelligence Bureau , B.N. Mullik recommends the setting of new posts in Kashmir, at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol and Palong Karpo  verily in consonance with the alleged rationale behind the 1954 line which is discussed in January 1959 at a meeting in the External Affairs Ministry in the presence of Gen. Thimayya , Chief of the Army staff and the Foreign Secretary, Mr. Subimal Dutt, who was a part of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru's coterie. Both the 
Army Chief and the Foreign Secretary  oppose the proposal to open border posts at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol  because according to them, the opening of the said posts would ‘provoke’ the Chinese, and create tension and “this part of the territory was useless to India".


4. Both Sarigh Jilganang Kol and Palong Karpo are well within the precincts of even the ab initio illegal, and null and void spurious and bogus 1954 line fraudulently concocted by Mr. Jawaharlal


Nehru out of the blue which had illegally surrendered vast areas of the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir, the purpose of which purportedly was "a firm and definite one , which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should be spread along this entire frontier".


5. In consonance with the alleged rationale and reasoning behind the spurious and bogus 1954 line, The Director of the Intelligence Bureau , B.N. Mullik  recommends the setting of new posts in Kashmir, at inter alia Sarigh Jilganang Kol and Palong Karpo which are well within the precincts of the left over part of Kashmir after the  ab initio illegal cartographical cession of  areas in the Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir including inter alia Dafdar, the Taghdumbash Pamir, the Mariom Pamir, Raskam, and the Kukalang, Sanju-la and Hindu-tash Passes in Kashmir.


6. The External Affairs Ministry in the presence of Gen Thimayya , Chief of the Army staff and the Foreign secretary Subimal Dutt reject the proposal as "it would ‘provoke’ the Chinese"! 


7. If the alleged reasons and rationale   for the concoction of the ab initio illegal 1954 Line could not be adhered to and Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru had neither inclination nor the will or desire to implement  and adhere to the rationale behind the ab initio illegal 1954 line, viz. The "Frontier should be considered a firm and definite one,  which is not open to discussion with any one. A system of check posts should be spread along this entire frontier", why was the ab initio illegal and fraudulent bogus and spurious 1954 line which illegally  surrendered vast areas in Kashmir in the aforesaid Cis-Kuen Tract in northern Kashmir and resulted in the illegal cartographical cession of territory of India and the illegal and fraudulent diminution of the territorial extent of India in a manner not known to law, at all  have to be published in the first place?

Friday, April 30, 2021

Request to the Survey of India for help in ascertaining the location of Kathaithum in the Kilian valley in Kashmir

 

I want to peruse a map of Kashmir which depicts the area of Kathaithum in the Kilian valley in Kashmir. I am not sure of the exact location of Kathaithum in the Kilian valley in Kashmir i.e whether Kathaithum is situate to the north  or to the south of the Kilian Pass in Kashmir on the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir. 


 The Maharajah of Kashmir considered the territory of Kashmir to extend up to the Kilian pass in the Kuen lun  range in northern Kashmir wherein are the Hindu-tash and Sanju - la passes in northern Kashmir  north of the Kashmiri town of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir.  

 According to “The Journal of the Royal Geographic Society of London”, Volume 40 By Royal Geographical Society (Great Britain), 

“It consists of a stone fort and several ruined huts, originally built by the Ladak wazeer of the Maharajah of Kashmir. The fort was occupied by a detachment of Kashmir troops from 1863 to 1866, during the disturbances caused by the rebellion against the Chinese in Eastern Turkistan; but on the invasion of Khotan by the Kush Begie in the autumn  of the later year, it was evacuated by the Kashmir troops who retired across the Karakoram. The Kush Begi sent a detachment of troops to occupy the fort, and it has since remained in the hands of the Yarkand ruler”.

“The Maharajah of Kashmir, it is believed, considered his territory to extend up to the Kilian range, north of Shadula, doubtless from the fact of having had a fort built there; but the last habitation now met with in his territory is at the head of the Nubra Valley,  in Ladak. The boundary line is given in the latest map of Turkistan as extending up to Kathaitum, in the Kilian Valley; but not only this valley, but the valleys of the Yarkand and Karakash rivers are frequented by the Kirghiz who all pay tribute to the ruler of Turkistan”! The stance of the author of this writeup in The Journal of the Royal Geographic Society of London is deceitful and treacherous and has to be contested. The Shahidullah fort was not "evacuated" by the Government of Kashmir, nor did the Kashmiri troops "retire" across the Karakoram, and nor did the fort remain in the hands of the Yarkand ruler since then! As late as 1885, the Government of Kashmir had in exercise of its sovereignty and territorial integrity wanted to renovate and restore the Kashmiri Fort of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir, but the Government of Kashmir was intimidated and prevented from doing so by the colonial English who were hand in glove and in collusion with the Chinese! The Kirghiz were nomads who were robbers who did belong to the area. They were busybodies and nomadic robbers who hailed from distant Kirghizstan and the Government of Kashmir had in exercise of its territorial sovereignty built a fort in the northern Kashmiri town of Shahidullah which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir to command the Kuen Lun  range  and to regulate and control these vagabond and criminal thugs, But it was one treacherous and deceitful Ney Elias who was British Joint Commissioner in Ladakh and spying on the Government of Kashmir who raised objections and successfully prevented the Government of Kashmir from exercising her right of sovereignty over that area in Kashmir. So the author of the write-up,one notorious G.W.Hayward who has the chronic propensity to be wayward is clearly lying, cheating  and suppressing and distorting facts and is indulging in Suppressio Veri Suggestio Falsi. Also, the fact that the Raskam Tract and the Taghdumbash and Mariom Pamir was a part of Kanjut historically since time immemorial is  suppressed and not divulged  by the author of the write-up.


This  pertains to the period immediately prior to the commencement of the Constitution of India  and the various maps published by the Survey of India  prior to 1954 pertaining to the period immediately prior to the commencement of the Constitution of India in particular inter alia the official maps attached to the White Papers published in July 1948 and February 1950 by the Government of India's Ministry of States, headed, incidentally, by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, under the authority of India's Surveyor General G.F.Heaney. One notorious Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru had  in 1954 in collusion with the Chinese published a bogus spurious map out of the blue in accordance with his perverted whims and fancies which illegally did not depict areas in Kashmir which hitherto had been depicted as integral part of India by Survey of India, Office of the Surveyor General of India,   in the various maps published prior to 1954 pertaining to the period immediately prior to the commencement of the Constitution of India in particular inter alia the official maps attached to the White Papers published in July 1948 and February 1950 by the Government of India's Ministry of States, headed, incidentally, by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, under the authority of India's Surveyor General G.F.Heaney. The survey of W.H. Johnson  established certain important points. Brinjga was the boundary post near the Karanghu Tagh Peak in the Kuen Lun in Ladakh, thus implying that the boundary of Kashmir lay along the Kuen Lun Range. Johnson’s  findings demonstrated that the whole of the Kara Kash valley was within the territory of the Maharaja of Kashmir and an integral part of the territory of Kashmir. He noted where the Chinese boundary post was accepted. At Yangi Langar, three marches from Khotan , he noticed that there were a few fruit trees at this place which originally was a post or guard house of the Chinese. Ney Elias who had been Joint Commissioner in Ladakh for several years noted on 21 September 1889 that he had met the Chinese in 1879 and 1880 when he visited Kashgar. According to Ney Elias , “They told me that they considered their line of chatze, or posts, as their frontier”  viz. , Kugiar, Kilian, Sanju, Kiria, etc.- and that they had


no concern with what lay beyond the mountains. The Chinese completed the reconquest of Eastern Turkistan in 1878. Before they lost it in 1863, their practical authority, as Ney Elias British Joint Commissioner in Leh from the end of the 1870s certain 1885, and Young Husband consistently maintained, "had never extended south of their outposts at Sanju and Kilian along the northern foothills of the Kuenlun range. Nor did they establish a known presence to the south of the line of outposts in the twelve years immediately following their return" ,  So, when the Government of Kashmir in 1885, at a time when the Chinese were least concerned of the alien  trans- Kuen Lun areas in the highlands of Kashmir, beyond their eastern Turkistan dominion “and had literally washed their hands of it”, prepared to unify Kashmir and the Wazir of Ladakh , Pandit Radha Kishen initiated steps to restore the old Kashmiri out post of Shahidulla, Ney Elias who was British Joint Commissioner in Ladakh and spying on the Government of Kashmir raised objections. “This very energetic officer’ , he wrote to the resident, who duely forwarded the letter to the Government of India, “wants the Maharaja to reoccupy Shahidulla in the Karakash valley ….I see indications of his preparing to carry it out, and, in my opinion, he should be restrained, or an awkward boundary question may be raised with the Chinese without any compensating advantage”. (italics mine to highlight) In the circumstances, since Elias had represented to the Supreme Government, it was a relatively simple matter for him to ensure that the plans were dropped. He told the Wazir that he had reported against the scheme to the Resident, and pretty soon the subservient Wazir succumbed and assured him that he did not intend to implement it. Elias was also promptly meticulously backed up by the Government of India. A letter dated 1st September was sent to the officer on Special Duty (as the Resident was called before 1885) instructing him to take suitable opportunity of advising His Highness the Maharaja not to occupy Shahidulla”. Elias had already killed the proposal. Thus, the English after treacherously perniciously successfully preventing the reunification of Kashmir vis-à-vis the outpost in the Shahidulla area in Kashmir which was virtually on the southern flanks of the Kuen Lun Range in northern Kashmir and the natural and historic border of Kashmir on the Kuen Lun range and beyond, by vehemently opposing it at a time when the Chinese were least concerned or bothered of the alien trans- Kuen Lun areas in the highlands of Kashmir, beyond their restive eastern Turkistan dominion “and had literally washed their hands of it”, rather than as much as supporting the endeavour much less aiding it, prevented the unification of Kashmir. 


One notorious certain Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru had in fact in collusion with the Chinese also arbitrarily, unconstitutionally and illegally published in 1954, a spurious and bogus map out of the blue in accordance with his perverted whims and fancies which illegally did not depict areas in Kashmir which hitherto had been depicted as integral part of India by the Survey of India in the various maps published prior to 1954 pertaining to the period immediately prior to the commencement of the Constitution of India in particular inter alia the official maps attached to the White Papers published in July 1948 and February 1950 by the Government of India's Ministry of States, headed, incidentally, by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, under the authority of India's Surveyor General G.F.Heaney.

I therefore in the light of the aforesaid information request your help in locating the position of Kathaithum in the Kilian valley in northern Kashmir. A detailed  old and credible map of the Kilian valley in Kashmir published by the Survey of India prior to 1954 may be furnished to me for my perusal and scrutiny.


As per the spurious and bogus map of Kashmir published illegally by the Survey of India  in 1954 at the behest of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru by the Survey of India, the Kuen Lun Border of India with East Turkistan from the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir, and the Kukalang ,Yangi Dawan, Kilian, Sanju-La, and Hindutash Passes in northern Kashmir, had been illegally restricted and illegally confined to only a section of the northern border of Aksai Chin pertaining to the small stretch of border in the area in Kashmir comprising Yangi, Cholpanglik Peak and Muztagh Peak, but now the shameless, wretched and spineless Babus in the Survey of India have obviously in collusion with the Chinese further perpetrated one more illegality over the earlier one of 1954 vis-à-vis Aksai Chin in north eastern Kashmir by further cartographically surrendering further inalienable parts of India in Aksai Chin to the Chinese occupying Tibet and East Turkistan by further illegally depicting areas comprising the headwaters of the Yarung Kash  or Yurung-Kash in Aksai Chin as not part of Aksai Chin and by portraying a line to the south of the Kuen Lun ridge rather than on the Kuen Lun Range whereby illegally forfeiting the Kuen Lun range border in a section of the Aksai Chin and illegally surrendering the head waters of the Yarung Kash in Aksai Chin to the Chinese occupying East Turkistan and Tibet! Patriotic and nationalist Indians beware of the nefarious and diabolical game plan of illegally surrendering further areas in India to the Chinese. Be afraid , be very afraid!