Major Gaurav Arya and his ignorance of the history of the western province of Baluchistan

What occupation are you talking about, Major Gaurav Arya? In the channel called "Defensive Offence" and in the video titled, "Major Gaurav Arya in Conversation with Baloch Leader Hyrbyair Marri", Major Gaurav Arya says absurd things and talks irresponsibly. He says that the western province of Baluchistan in Pakistan is allegedly under Pakistani Occupation! Whereas, Baluchistan is historically an inalienable part of India and after Pakistan was created, as the  successor state, Baluchistan is an inalienable part of Pakistan.  No new Sovereign states will be permitted to be created in South Asia or The Sub-continent of India. In the unlikely event of the disintegration of Pakistan, Baluchistan shall summarily merge back into India. No other options. No new fake, spurious, bogus Sovereign states shall be permitted to be created in South Asia neither by hook

nor by crook at the behest of hostile alien foreign Intelligence Agencies colluding with anti-nationals in India camouflaged under the façade of Geostategists! The Mehrgarh Civilization is part of India’s Sindhu Valley Civilization, the glorious Shortugai - Shahr-e Sukhteh - Sutkagan Dor- Lothal Civilization of India.   Major Gaurav Arya, are you with some vested interest trying to separate the Mehrgarh Civilization in the Kachchhi plains, in Kalat in Baluchistan in Pakistan from the rest of the Sindhu Valley Civilization? Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Is this how you place India first in your channel Defensive Offence? Both of you need to apologise to the proud people of India for your anti-national act. It is disgusting and obnoxious. What nonsense are you talking? To what low can you stoop? Are you out of your mind? And the Baluch who intruded into what is now Baluchistan and Seistan  from Kaman in northern or Northwestern Persia in around  the 11th Century have nothing whatsoever to do with India's ancient indigenous Indus Valley Civilization of Baluchistan. Nor do they have anything whatsoever to do with the glorious Sarasvati Civilization of the Helmand or Hindmand Basin in Sistan. Mr. Hyrbyair  Marri, the ambassador of the Mehergarh Civilization? Even, Mr. Marri is flabbergasted and cannot believe his ears when you say such absurd and ridiculous things!  These nomadic people who came from Kaman in the Caspian Sea coast of Persia or from Aleppo in the 11th Century don't inherit the Mehrgarh Civilization, the glorious Shortugai - Shahr-e Sukhteh - Sutkagan Dor- Lothal Civilization of India which is per se  India's Civilization.  During the seventh century, The Balus had not yet entered Makran but had entered only by the eleventh century. Baluchistan was inhabited by Indian communities loosely categorised as Zutt i.e.  Jat who were predominantly Hindu or Buddhist and the whole of Baluchistan was predominantly non-Persian.  The Balus migrated from Kaman in northern or Northwestern Persia some time around the tenth century  when they appeared in Kirman. Then under pressure from the Seljuks, these  nomads they moved eastward and encroached and entered India across the Sarhad Range separating India from Persia into what is now Sijistan and Baluchistan in western India where they superimposed themselves upon the indigenous Indian Brahui population and also drove out the other Indian communities away. If the Baluch want a sovereign state, they can go back to Kaman on the Caspian Sea coast or even  Aleppo in Syria and create one there, not in the western province of Baluchistan in Pakistan! Mr. Hyrbyair  Marri, the name Sindh mentioned in the National anthem of India is comprehensive and all-embracing and also historically includes the western province of and Baluchistan and Sijistan or Sistan in Afghanistan so you need not worry about India's National Anthem. If you and your followers are so upset about calling yourself Pakistani, you and your followers can get deported en masse  to Kaman by the Caspian Sea or wherever you like outside the Sub-continent of India and proclaim a sovereign state in that place. Like you, Major Gaurav Arya reiterated, if anyone took arms against the Indian state, he will not be spared. The same is applicable to any part of Pakistan, including the provinces of Panjab and Baluchistan. Baluchistan can have the option of either remaining in Pakistan or merging with India in the remote unlikely event of the disintegration of Pakistan. As you, Major Gaurav Arya reiterated, there is only an Indian Nation and nationalism, not  regional nationalism. You did not  tell him to his face that India rejects the two nation theory and would he as the alleged representative of a section of the people of the western province of Baluchistan like to remain part of  Pakistan or accede to India as no new Sovereign states will be permitted to be created in South Asia or the Sub-continent of India? Instead, rather you were nodding your head like a doll to whatever he said  without understanding the ramifications and repercussions of what he was saying to the effect that he was claiming parity of the western province of Baluchistan as an allegedly sovereign state on par with the rest of India which is not possible in the Sub-continent of India, but may be possible in Kaman or Aleppo! Major, Gaurav Arya, Your entire demeanor was that of a subservient and servile person nodding your head like a doll to what all gibberish this Mr. Hyrbyair  Marri was talking! Finally you were talking about intellectuals in India who lived in an Utopia and needed to be sorted out! I am a Pan South Asian Nationalist and believe in the eminent and eventual impending reunification of South Asia or the Sub-continent of India including the western provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan in Pakistan and I will oppose any creation of any more new fake spurious bogus sovereign states. How are you going to sort that out? Perhaps the Intelligence Agencies of the alien foreign hostile countries ( and I don't need to tell you who they are, surely) whose diabolical conspiracy and nefarious gameplan is to create additional new fake bogus and spurious so-called Sovereign states in the sub-continent of India in order to prevent India from becoming a global super power would help you out? They would, wouldn't they (help you to sort out) ? 

Historic territory of Nepal lost to the Chinese occupying Sovereign Tibet

Do you realise that Nepal used to have a border touching the Headwaters of the Brahmaputra if not the Brahmaputra itself? The line demarcated as Tibet- Nepal border is deliberately along the foothills of the Himalaya rather than in the crests of the Himalayas or the watershed giving away vast areas which are historically a part of Nepal.

The International border of Nepal with South Tibet

should be on the watershed of the Himalaya on the Langhphu, Nyonni Ri, thence to Doya La and to Everest Massif, thence to Thong La and the ridge to the north of Gosainthan Peak fully in Nepal, thence to the ridge north of Jongka and thence to Baruduksun.

The so-called leaders of Nepal ignore this because of the freak artificial position attained by Nepal which they want to sustain and for which they have to be subservient and servile towards the Chinese after  the Chinese illegal military occupation of India's neighbouring country, the sovereign state of Tibet which is the one and only historic shield and barrier between India  and China.

How to deal with China

How does India deal with China? China does not have any further territorial claims in northern Vietnam! The demarcation of the Vietnam China border is already outrageously and predominantly biased in favour of China. Ultimately, the Chinese have already occupied all the territory in India which they want and claim. Aksai Chin, the Cis- Kuen Lun Tract in Kashmir extending from the Chhogori Peak (K2) and the Shimshal in central Kashmir to the Raskam adjoining the Kuen Lun Range in northern

Kashmir wherein are the Dafdar, the Taghdumbash Pamir and Mariom Pamir in northern Kashmir and the Kukalang, Yangi, Kilian, Sanju-la and Hindutash Passes in Kashmir, Rudokh, Shang Shung or Guge. India cannot permit the status quo to continue where India would continue to claim that, say the Aksai Chin or Cis-Kuen Tract is an integral part of India and under illegal Chinese occupation but the territory would  continue to remain in illegal military  Chinese occupation prolonged and indefinitely. India has to do something to take back our areas from illegal Chinese occupation. That's why, China is so very utterly desperate to clinch a deal in the so called border talks because it is they who desperately want to give legitimacy and credibility to their illegal occupation of parts of India. India has to voraciously raise the issue of the disputed restive area of Ningxia & Shanxi in the far distant northwestern frontiers of China adjoining the Republic of Mongolia in the International fora whenever China raises the issue of Kashmir! When China raises the issue of Kashmir

which is per se an integral part of India historically, we should not retaliate by talking about Tibet or East Turkistan which are per se foreign countries which historically were never part of China. We should not equate Kashmir with Tibet or East Turkistan, which is what they prefer. They would laugh behind our backs! What Afghanistan is historically to India as the northwestern part of India historically, Shanxi is historically to China! Chinese occupied East Turkistan is not a part of distant China in East Asia. There is an independence movement going on in East Turkistan and if the cunning,  sly and shrewd Regime in China is  able to deceive the international community and convince them that the independence movement is inspired by the Tahliban and Al -Qaeda, then the Chinese can obtain a carte

blanche and summarily  suppress,annihilate and exterminate  the legitimate independence movement with impunity   without having to adhere to principles of rule of law or  to any protocol adhered to by civilised nations whatsoever under the façade of alleged  war against Islamic jihadi terror  without being questioned, accountable or answerable to the International Community about their commission of the grave crimes against humanity and of genocide on the East Turkistanis or the violation of  their   human rights!  In reality the movement for the independence of East Turkistan is no more a manifestation of Islamic terror than the movement for the independence of Tibet is a manifestation of Buddhist terrorism!

Baluchistan, historically an inalienable and integral part of India

 "Within Baluchistan the population is not ethnically homogeneous. Some communities are identified (by themselves and others) as Balōč (see 10 below), with the implication that they are descended from those who

entered the area as Balōč; while others, though considered members of Baluch society now and identifying as Baluch in relation to the outside world, are known within Baluch society by other tribal (e.g., Nowšērvānī, Gīčkī, Bārakzay) and subethnic (e.g., Brahui, Dehwār, ḡolām, Jaḍgāl, Mēd) designations, with the implication that they have adopted Baluch identity relatively recently—but not that they are for that reason in any way outsiders. Some of these “Baluch” predate the arrival of the Balōč. Others (e.g., the Bārakzay, q.v., who are of recent Afghan origin) postdate them. There are also remnants of what were (under autonomous Baluch rule, as well as under the British, 1666-1947) larger non-Muslim communities, mostly Hindu, Sikh, Ismaʿili, or Bahai traders, who are not considered Baluch. The Baluchi language was the language of interethnic as well as intertribal relations. Although participation in Baluchi intercourse generally seems to have led to assimilation, being Muslim appears to have been a necessary precondition. However, the Baluch in the Makrān who became Ḏekrī (Zikri) in the 10/16th century did not for that reason cease to be Baluch. The Baluch generally claim that all Baluch are Hanafite Muslims, although, apart from the Ḏekrīs (who are known but rarely discussed), there are some small Shiʿite communities on the northwestern fringes of Iranian Baluchistan, a fact which is unknown farther east".  

The Baloch tribes rise up from their original home in Aleppo, all sons of Mir Hamza (generally taken to be the uncle of the prophet Muhammad) to fight against the second Ummayad Caliph Yazid I at Karbala in 680. After Hoseyn is slain, the angered Balochi tribes wander way eastward and encroach into the western provinces of Baluchistan and Sijistan. (Kreyenbroek, Philip G. (2010). Oral Literature of Iranian Languages: Kurdish, Pashto, Balochi, Ossetic, Persian and Tajik: Companion Volume II: History of Persian Literature A, Volume 18. I. B. Tauris. ISBN 978-0857732651). 

The seditious Baluch can very well return to where ever they came from Halab (Aleppo) or Kaman in the Caspian region and create their "historic" "Baluch" nation by the shores of the Caspian Sea! During the seventh century, The Balus had not yet entered Makran but had entered by the eleventh century. Baluchistan was inhabited by Indian communities loosely categorised as Zutt i.e. Jat and the whole of Baluchistan was predominantly non Persian. The Baloch began migrating towards the east in the late Sasanian period. The cause of the migration is unknown but may have been as a result of the generally unstable conditions in the Caspian area. The migrations occurred over several centuries. By the 9th century, Arab writers refer to the Baloch as having entered into  Sistan, and Makran in what was western India.  The Balus migrated from Kaman to the east or southeast of the

central Caspian region in northern or Northwestern Persia some time around the tenth century when they appeared in Kirman. Then under pressure from the Seljuks,  these nomads they moved eastward and entered India across the Sarhad Range separating India from the eastern Frontier territory of Kerman into Baluchistan where they superimposed themselves upon the indigenous Indian Brahui population and also drove out the other Indian communities.

In the 10 the century the Balus were present in Kirman and they infested the Great desert of Persia from their mountain fastness at Qufs. Muqadasi describes them as people with savage faces, evil hearts and neither morals nor manners. They were notorious for their cruelty and indulged in stoning their prisoners to death “as one would a snake , putting a man’s head on a boulder, and beating upon it, till it be crushed in”! Baluchistan is an integral part of India historically and since time immemorial and after the partition of India, as the successor8 state, Baluchistan in its entirety including the Occupied western portion of the western province of Baluchistan is an integral and inalienable part of Pakistan and no power on earth or beyond can separate the western province of Baluchistan in Pakistan from the rest of Pakistan. As long as the Baluch do not aspire for “independence” vide a circumventious route like what illegally happened in the eastern part of the province of Bengal! There will be no further creation of a new sovereign country in the Sub-continent of India or South Asia, and If any province of any country wants to accede and become a part of another country inside the sub-continent of India, it is another thing! Even if a country in South Asia is going to breakup, India will not permit the provinces of the said country to become sovereign and independent at a time when India is spiralling towards the re-unification of India! Let that be made clear to one and all! Some vested interests aspired for the independence of the predominantly Muslim majority area in eastern Bengal in near eastern India and they knew that they could not make eastern Bengal independent on their own, so they made use of the Muslim majority areas in north western India viz, Panjab, Kashmir, Sindh, Baluchistan and Afghanistan to create a demand for an independent state for the Muslims in India and thus after they themselves sought and having successfully created a separate state for the Muslims in India, they were able to illegally get separated from that Muslim state which they themselves had sought and created in the first place and not the Indian Muslims residing in the aforesaid Muslim majority area in north western India who neither wanted nor aspired for, and become independent of that independent state for the Muslims in India, in a circumventious route by taking advantage of the fact that eastern Bengal was not contiguous to (what was legally) the rest of Pakistan!

Chah Bahar is not a part of Iran. Chah Bahar is in the western province of Baluchistan and Tiz or Chah Babar is historically the place from where the coast of India commences and is historically an inalienable part of India. As a matter of fact the Sarhad range which runs from north to south and separates the Sub-continent of India from the Plateau of Iran, commences in the vicinity of Tiz. After the partition of India the successor state is Pakistan and Baluchistan is an inalienable part of Pakistan and the English deliberately as part of their nefarious game plan fraudulently drew and demarcated spurious and bogus lines which they portrayed as the external frontiers of the sub-continent of India. These spurious lines are per se illegal and a future reunified India will not be bound by such deceitful and fraudulent demarcations whereby vast areas of India were handed over in a platter to countries adjacent to India!

According to the scholar and historian, Alberuni, author of an encyclopedic work on India called "Tarikh Al-Hind", the sea coast of India commences with Tiz or modern Chah Bahar. As a matter of fact the Sarhad range which runs from north to south and separates the Sub-continent of India from the Plateau of Iran, commences in the vicinity of Tiz. It is suggested that a coastal route existed linking Lothal and Dholavira to Sutkagan Dor on the Makran coast in Baluchistan in western India.  Anyone can furnish information pertaining to the theory that the Sindhu Valley Civilization (Harappan Culture ) got extinct due to the an accident involving the Kailasa peak in northern India? A profound aspect of the Sindhu valley civilization is the vastness of the area comprising a vast area of the north western part of the India extending from inter alia Sutkagan Dor in Baluchistan and Sokhta Koh, Shahr-i Sokhta, Mundigak and Shortugai in Afghanistan to Lothal in Gujarat and beyond.

According to Sergent writing regarding Shortugai, "not one of the standard characteristics of the Harappan cultural complex is missing from it"! Bernard Sergent. Genèse de l'Inde, quoted by Elst 1999.

 "Men like Ibn Haukal [d. 988 AD]. Istakhari [d.957 AD] and Idrisi [d.1161 AD] give graphic accounts of the fertility and greatness of the Makran region its vibrant cities and distances from each Caravan station to the next, and cities enroute towards Sindh river. The pen-picture is so vivid that it leaves little for imagination, along with maps and their general observations as they saw the route, and the traffic on the highway. The Later Great port for Arabs on the Makran coast, and old sea capital of Makran was Tiz [Chahbahr], about 100 miles west of present Gawadar port. Where lay a city, which held the Arabs spell bound by its Grandeur and Magnificence, the convenient sheltered harbour, Even till late 19th century, as narrated by Colonel. Sir Thomas Holdich, in his book Gates of India,1910,enormous heaps of debris were seen in the old ruins of Tiz, with broken pottery ,suggesting that old inhabitants of Tiz, had devoted a lot of time in production of Ceramics art works, and every fresh rain unsurfaced fragments of new curiosities in Glass ware and china, Here along the coast line cities, was seen a special class of pottery, of very fine texture and finished with a light sage-green glaze-said to have possessed the property of detecting poison by cracking if poisoned food or drink was served in them".

 

If those vagabond nomads from Kaman in the Caspian Sea region of the Persian Empire who migrated across Persia and crossed the far eastern Frontier territory of Kerman bordering India on the Sarhad Range border and entered India and invaded India in the 10th Century AD and supplanted the indigenous Indic Indian Indo-Aryan population of Baluchistan in the 10th century are intransigent and endeavour to accomplish a fait accompli and try to legitimise their ab initio illegal invasion and occupation of what was western India by seeking to create a bogus and spurious so-called sovereign state of Baluchistan in the Sub-Continent of India, they should be summarily deported bag and baggage back to Kaman and they can create a sovereign state in Kaman adjoining the Caspian Sea region in Persia from where they come and from where they belong, hail and originate!

The territorial extent of Kanjut

No one seems to be quiet sure how the Kanjutis started to cultivating the Raskam valley.^[6] The river is known by the glittering name of Zafarshan, the gold scatterer. According to Kanjuti traditions, as related by McMahon , the Mir’s eighth ancestor, Shah Salim Khan pursued the nomadic Kherghiz thieves upto Tash Khurghan and defeated them.^[7]

“to celebrate this victory, Shah Salim Khan erected a stone cairn at Dafdar and sent a trophy of a Khirghiz head to the Chinese with a message that Hunza territory extended as far as Dafdar”. The Kanjutis were already in effective possession of the Raskam and no question had been raised about It. The Mir’s claims went a good deal beyond a mere right of cultivation. He “asserts that forts were built by the Hunza people with out any objection or interference from the Chinese at Dafdar, Qurghan, Ujadhbhai, Azar on the Yarkand river and at three or four other places in Raskam.” 

McMahon was able to prima facie roughly define the territorial limits of Kanjut. “The boundaries of Taghdumbash, Khunjerab and Raskam, as claimed by the Kanjuts, are the following: the northern watershed of the Taghdumbash Pamir from the Wakhijrui pass through the Baiyik peak to Dafdar, thence across the river to the Zankan nullah; thence through Mazar and over the range to Urok, a point on the Yarkand river between Sibjaida and Itakturuk. Thence it runs along the northern watershed of the Raskam valley to the junction of the Bazar Dara river and the Yarkand river. From thence southwards over the mountains to the Mustagh river leaving the Aghil Dewan and Aghil pass within Hunza limits.^[8]

McMahon’s information was substantially corroborated in^[9] "Seven locations in the Raskam were involved. Azgar and Ursur on the right bank, and five others on the left, that is on the Mustagh-Karakoram side-Kukbash, Kirajilga, Ophrang, Uroklok, and Oitughrak, extending from Sarakamish, north of Kunjerab pass to Bazar Dara, north of the Arghil pass , comprising an area of about 3000 acres.”

1898 by Captain H.P.P.Deasy who threw up a commission to devote himself to Trans Himalayan exploration. An item of special interest was Deasy’s description of the limits of Raskam. Starting from Aghil Dewan or pass, in the Karakoram range, the dividing line ran north-east to Bazar Dara, where it met the Yarkand river. He found an out post built of earth at Bazar Dara, surmounted by a Chinese flag, (by 1898 the Chinese had for the first time in history intruded to the area south of the Kuen Lun mountains) with a few unarmed Kirghiz in occupation. This was obviously intended as a Chinese boundary marker. From there the line ran “along the northern watershed of the Raskam valley to Dafdar in the Taghdumbash Pamir, to the north of the mills at that place, and thence to the Baiyik peak. Deasy also came upon clear evidence of what could only have been Kanjuti occupation. South of Azgar “many ruins of houses, old irrigation channels and fields now no longer tilted , testify to Raskam having formerly been inhabited and cultivated”. Anyone familiar with the care with which the Kanjuts cultivate every available strip of land in their own Hunza would have no hesitation in regarding this as proof of long standing Kanjuti occupation. The remains could not have been attributed to the Kirghiz; they were unfamiliar with the state of art.

The Chinese completed the reconquest of eastern Turkistan in 1878. Before they lost it in 1863, their practical authority, as Ney Elias and Younghusband consistently maintained, had never extended south of their outposts at Sanju and Kilian along the northern foothills of the Kuenlun range. Nor did they establish a known presence to the south of the line of outposts in the twelve years immediately following their return.^[10] Ney Elias who had been Joint Commissioner in Ladakh for several years noted on 21 September 1889 that he had met the Chinese in 1879 and 1880 when he visited Kashgar. “they told me that they considered their line of ‘chatze’, or posts, as their frontier – viz. , Kugiar, Kilian, Sanju, Kiria, etc.- and that they had no concern with what lay beyond the mountains” i.e. the Kuen Lun range in northern Kashmir.^[11]

In 1927, the Indian Government, according to a report in the Times, March 6, 1963 “decided that a claim of the Mir of Kashmir that his dominions were bound on the north by the northern watershed of the Kuenlun ranges was insupportable”.^[12]

Dvipa Sukhadhara and the mainland part of India

Indians have been in limine  residing in the Socotra archipelago since ancient times and the name Socotra is itself derived from Dvipa Sukhadhara in India's Sanskrit. Indians were residing in the islands at least since 1st century BCE and 6th century CE and were practicing agriculture. The 1st century author of Periplus of the Erythraean Sea mentions that Indians lived in Sukhadhara Dvipa since the 1st century CE, and the same has also been established In 2001 by a group of Belgian speleologists of the Socotra Karst Project. The Belgian Socotra Karst Project (SKP)] has revealed numerous Indian inscriptions particularly in the island´s most impressive caves: Hoq Cave at the north-east coast of Socotra in the Brahmi script of near western India and Kharoshti script of north western India comprising what is now the area of present-day Pakistan and Afghanistan in the northwestern part of the Sub-continent of India. According to the Arab historian, al-Masudi writing in the tenth century AD, it was Aristotle, the tutor of Alexander, who titillated the latter's interest in Socotra by referring to the availability of myrrh, which was widely used for medicinal purposes. According to al-Masudi, (quoted in Ubaydli 1989:150) moreover, the Greek colonists were handpicked by Aristotle and came from his native town. "They overcame the Indians who were there and took hold of the island" An important early Christian] leader who was himself most probably a Socotran was Theophilus (called Theophilos the Indian or Theophilus the Arian). "Theophilus was an adherent of Arianism, a heresy that was widespread through the church for centuries. Arius, the originator of this pernicious fallacy, denied the Holy Trinity and the Deity of Christ". Samuel H. Moffett alias Samuel Hugh Moffett (Samuel Hugh Moffett, A History of Christianity in Asia (Harper San Francisco 1992) p.267) describes the ministry of Theophilus and his missionary journeys that took place in 354 AD:, Theophilus “the Indian” a native of the Islands of Socotra (A History of Christianity in India: The Beginnings to AD 1707, Page 41, By Stephen Neill published by Cambridge University Press) in the Indian Ocean… was held in Rome as a hostage, converted to Christianity, and was sent by Roman Emperor Constantius II on an embassy that included visit to his homeland in the Islands of Socotra, and to “other parts of India.” According to the Acts of Thomas St. Thomas initially arrived in northwestern India to the Kingdom of Gomdapharnasa or Gudapharasa comprising Baluchistan, Sistan, Kabul and Panjab and then he departed from the mainland part of   northwestern India and sojourned in the island of Socotra in 52 AD following a shipwreck where the inhabitants were converted to Christianity before returning back to the mainland part of the country where he arrived at the port of Kodungallur in Kerala in southern India. The city of Andrapolis named in the Acts, where Judas Thomas and Abbanes landed in  India, has been identified as Sandaruck (one of the ancient Alexandrias) in the province of Baluchistan in northwestern India. 
Socotra was also a part

of Bombay Presidency in  India at a time when India was  administered by the British but was stealthily, surreptitiously and clandestinely detached and separated from the rest of India in 1937 and ab initio illegally removed from the rest of India as part of their game plan along with the bag and baggage of Aden, which is not part of India unlike Socotra under the guise and façade of separating Aden which was a foreign territory arbitrarily clubbed with India, unlike  Socotra which was per se historically an integral and inalienable part of India since time immemorial and is a part of the Chagos- Socotra Ridge, or The so-called  Carlsberg Ridge like a Trojan Horse, vide the Government of India Act, 1935. Sukhadhara dvipa perhaps was also geologically a part of the mainland lndian landmass but was obviously detached during the course of plate tectonics as India began an eventful journey and moved northwards towards Asia in consonance with her tryst with destiny. 

This fraudulent and deceitful outrageous and covert ab initio illegal partition of India which was per se null and void ought to have created an uproar, outrage, ruckus, unrest and pandemonium all over the rest of India and The leadership of the Indian National Congress ought to have issued an ultimatum to the Anglo-Saxon regime calling upon the Anglo-Saxon regime to rescind the fraudulent separation of Socotra from the rest of India and the partition of India which would have resulted in the undoing and vitiating of this deceitful and fraudulent partition of India which was a momentarily a treacherous fait accompli by  stealth and deceit then and there, but as usual, the so-called Indian National Congress and its leaders were sleeping by design or default and did not wake up from their slumber! Alas, did a certain, one all-knowing  Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru even think at all about the island? Did the word Socotra ever emanate from his lips. His whole conduct and demeanour was that of a happy-go-lucky person in collusion with the Anglo-Saxon regime in the British Isles! A person who ran with the hare and hunted with the hounds! Had it been China,  it would have been just the opposite and all hell would have broken loose! 

Recognition of Tibet as a Sovereign Nation

Why should at all Tibet be a part of the Chinese empire? Is Korea or Japan or Burma a part of China? The underlining reason for the succumbing and capitulation by the Dalai Lama is coercion and duress and If he wants Tibet to be a part of another country, Tibet can accede to India which is the mother country and the source of Tibetan culture and civilization. Is China going to decolonise Tibet and take back the Chinese settlers? Is China going to recognise Amdo and Kham and Altyn Tagh as an inalienable and integral part of Tibet and declare the partition of Tibet as illegal and unlawful? Is China going to return to Tibet the territory in Tibet annexed to adjoining Chinese western frontier provinces and undo the annexation of parts of Tibet to adjoining East Turkistan to the north of the International Boundary on the Altyn Tagh Range? Is China going to apologise for the Crimes against Humanity and genocide committed on the Tibetans and pay reparations to Tibet and Is China going to recognise a reunified Tibet comprising the areas of southern Tibet, Altyn Tagh and Amdo, and Kham as a state on par with China in a federation comprising inter alia China , Tibet, Southern Mongolia , and East Turkistan? What nonsense is the Dalai Lama talking? The proud Tibetan people should denounce and repudiate his unscrupulous statements and show him his place and ask him to mind his business as the spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhism

and not meddle in the Political affairs of Tibet vis-à-vis the legal status of Tibet as a Sovereign state! As stated by me, the issue of independence of Tibet is not to be decided just by the Tibetans alone. India has an unfettered and absolute right to a unified and Sovereign and neutral Tibet which is historically the traditional neighbouring country of India and a shield and barrier between distant and far away State of China in East Asia and India which cannot and will not be compromised! Sooner rather than later there will be a sea change in the foreign policy of India vis-à-vis China and India will have to go back to the basic crux of the issue rather than beating around the bush which is that historically China is a distant and far away country in East Asia which shares a border neither with the Republic of India nor the Sub-continent of India. There has to inevitably be a Sea Change in the foreign policy of India and the Government of India should in recognition of the sovereign status of our historical and traditional neighbouring countries, i.e. Tibet and East Turkistan in no uncertain terms tell the Chinese bluntly in their face unequivocally that China is a country in distant and far away East Asia which historically shared a border with neither the Republic of India nor the Sub-continent of India and there is nothing for the Government of India to talk to the rogue state militarily and illegally occupying the sovereign states of Tibet and East Turkistan and that India will in due course at the appropriate time and place talk to the legitimate de jure Governments of the Sovereign States of East Turkistan and Tibet. Historically India and China had friendly relations only because both the two countries were far away and distant and so remote from each other. India was the sub-continent of India or South Asia and China was in East Asia and between both these two nations was the buffer lands of Tibet, Mongolia and East Turkistan which had to be traversed by Chinese monks in search of knowledge and wisdom from India, China has no more right to Tibet or business in Tibet than India has and China has no more right to claim a border at Mount Everest than India has a right to claim an International Border with China at Minyak Gangkar. So there!

It is high time that there is a Sea change in the foreign

policy of India towards China and India goes back to the basic issue and condemn and denounce one Mr.Jawaharlal Nehru rather than beat around the bush and try to redress the anti- Indian policies of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru who in collusion with inter alia the Chinese and Government of the United Kingdom to the detriment of India has inflicted the greatest damage to India and India will continue to bleed for a prolonged and indefinite period of time, and tell the Chinese in no uncertain terms that China is a distant country in East Asia and China neither has a common border with India nor the Sub-continent of India and India has nothing whatsoever to talk to the Chinese pertaining to India's international border with Tibet and East Turkistan and India only needs to liberate the areas in India under Chinese occupation peacefully or otherwise and nothing else, and that Tibet is not a part of China but historically a buffer and shield between India or the Sub-continent of India and distant China in East Asia. Any outcome of the illegal border talks with the Chinese is per se on the basis of subservience. coercion and duress and is ab initio illegal and null and void and will be denounced and repudiated by the people of India. The Indian Government should not shamelessly create a situation whereby the proud people of India should be made to denounce and repudiate the so called border talks with a distant and far away country which does not at all share a border with India and has a military presence along the frontiers of India only because of its blatant illegal military occupation of Tibet and East Turkistan. So there!

The entire so-called border talks which is being conducted by these well dressed subservient, spineless, shameless and anti-national Babus under duress and coercion with a distant and far away country, China in East Asia which neither shares an International Border with India nor the Sub-continent of India but is in illegal military occupation of our Sovereign neighbouring nations of Tibet and East Turkistan is only to subserve the purpose of China and to give legitimacy to its illegal occupation of the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract in northern

Kashmir particularly India's beloved Aksai Chin and is  per se ab initio illegal and null and void and also ultra vires the Sacrosanct Constitution of India! The foolish Government of India should not create a situation where a so-called successful "deal is clinched" and a "historic agreement is arrived" with China which will result in creating a situation which will be a further mess and a further burden cast on the proud people of India to repudiate, denounce and  undo and vitiate it, where there will be a revolution in India and the whole procedure will be waiting to be inevitably repudiated and denounced by the proud people of India.